[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] s390x: kvm: Make kvm_sclp_service_call void
From: |
Janosch Frank |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] s390x: kvm: Make kvm_sclp_service_call void |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Nov 2019 19:25:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 |
On 11/27/19 7:07 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 27.11.19 18:50, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> It defaults to returning 0 anyway and that return value is not
>> necessary, as 0 is also the default rc that the caller would return.
>>
>> While doing that we can simplify the logic a bit and return early if
>> we inject a PGM exception. Also we always set a 0 cc, so let's not
>> base it on the rc of the sclp emulation functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> target/s390x/kvm.c | 12 +++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
>> index 0c9d14b4b1..08bb1edca0 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
>> @@ -1159,13 +1159,13 @@ void kvm_s390_access_exception(S390CPU *cpu,
>> uint16_t code, uint64_t te_code)
>> kvm_s390_vcpu_interrupt(cpu, &irq);
>> }
>>
>> -static int kvm_sclp_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run,
>> +static void kvm_sclp_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run,
>> uint16_t ipbh0)
>> {
>> CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
>> uint64_t sccb;
>> uint32_t code;
>> - int r = 0;
>> + int r;
>>
>> sccb = env->regs[ipbh0 & 0xf];
>> code = env->regs[(ipbh0 & 0xf0) >> 4];
>> @@ -1173,11 +1173,9 @@ static int kvm_sclp_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, struct
>> kvm_run *run,
>> r = sclp_service_call(env, sccb, code);
>> if (r < 0) {
>> kvm_s390_program_interrupt(cpu, -r);
>> - } else {
>> - setcc(cpu, r);
>> + return;
>> }
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> + setcc(cpu, 0);
>
> For now, sclp_service_call will return <= 0 ... but don't we actually
> have the option to return a cc? What does the spec say? Always set to 0?
>
> At least also the TCG implementation sets the CC to whatever is returned
> here .... and Claudio's unit tests have code to handle cc != 0 ... and
> the kernel as well (drivers/s390/char/sclp.h:sclp_service_call())
There's 0 (initiated), busy and operational and as far as I know we
implement neither.
sclp_service_call() returns either 0 or -PGM_CODE, so we don't need to
check when we're after the pgm injection code.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] s390x: Move reset normal to shared reset handler, (continued)
- [PATCH v4 3/6] s390x: Move initial reset, Janosch Frank, 2019/11/27
- [PATCH v4 5/6] s390x: Beautify diag308 handling, Janosch Frank, 2019/11/27
- [PATCH v4 6/6] s390x: kvm: Make kvm_sclp_service_call void, Janosch Frank, 2019/11/27
- Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] s390x: kvm: Make kvm_sclp_service_call void, David Hildenbrand, 2019/11/27
- Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] s390x: kvm: Make kvm_sclp_service_call void, David Hildenbrand, 2019/11/27
- Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] s390x: kvm: Make kvm_sclp_service_call void,
Janosch Frank <=
- Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] s390x: kvm: Make kvm_sclp_service_call void, Janosch Frank, 2019/11/27
- Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] s390x: kvm: Make kvm_sclp_service_call void, Cornelia Huck, 2019/11/28
- Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] s390x: kvm: Make kvm_sclp_service_call void, Janosch Frank, 2019/11/29
- Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] s390x: kvm: Make kvm_sclp_service_call void, Cornelia Huck, 2019/11/29
- [PATCH v5] s390x: kvm: Make kvm_sclp_service_call void, Janosch Frank, 2019/11/29
- Re: [PATCH v5] s390x: kvm: Make kvm_sclp_service_call void, David Hildenbrand, 2019/11/29
Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] s390x: kvm: Make kvm_sclp_service_call void, Thomas Huth, 2019/11/28
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] s390x: Cleanup, Cornelia Huck, 2019/11/29