[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 15/15] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly
From: |
Janosch Frank |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 15/15] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:29:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 |
On 11/21/19 12:24 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 20.11.19 12:43, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> Status storing is obviously not done by qemu anymore.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> target/s390x/sigp.c | 7 +++++--
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/sigp.c b/target/s390x/sigp.c
>> index 2ce22d4dc1..68634d694a 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/sigp.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/sigp.c
>> @@ -144,7 +144,9 @@ static void sigp_stop_and_store_status(CPUState *cs,
>> run_on_cpu_data arg)
>> case S390_CPU_STATE_STOPPED:
>> /* already stopped, just store the status */
>> cpu_synchronize_state(cs);
>> - s390_store_status(cpu, S390_STORE_STATUS_DEF_ADDR, true);
>> + if (!cpu->env.pv) {
>> + s390_store_status(cpu, S390_STORE_STATUS_DEF_ADDR, true);
>> + }
>
> Confused, how is that case handled? The CPU is already stopped, so it
> won't be run again (consequently, next SIE entry can't store it). Who
> will store the status?
Firmware does some magic
>
>> break;
>> }
>> si->cc = SIGP_CC_ORDER_CODE_ACCEPTED;
>> @@ -497,7 +499,8 @@ void do_stop_interrupt(CPUS390XState *env)
>> if (s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_STOPPED, cpu) == 0) {
>> qemu_system_shutdown_request(SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_GUEST_SHUTDOWN);
>> }
>> - if (cpu->env.sigp_order == SIGP_STOP_STORE_STATUS) {
>> + /* Storing will occur on next SIE entry for fmt 4 */
>> + if (cpu->env.sigp_order == SIGP_STOP_STORE_STATUS && !env->pv) {
>> s390_store_status(cpu, S390_STORE_STATUS_DEF_ADDR, true);
>> }
>> env->sigp_order = 0;
>>
>
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [PATCH 13/15] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD, (continued)
[PATCH 15/15] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly, Janosch Frank, 2019/11/20
Re: [PATCH 00/15] s390x: Protected Virtualization support, Cornelia Huck, 2019/11/20
Re: [PATCH 00/15] s390x: Protected Virtualization support, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2019/11/29