[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] s390x: always provide pci support
From: |
David Hildenbrand |
Subject: |
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] s390x: always provide pci support |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:51:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 |
On 11.02.19 12:32, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> We tried to make pci support optional on s390x in the past;
> unfortunately, we still require the s390 phb to be created
> unconditionally due to backwards compatibility issues.
>
> Instead of sinking more effort into this (including compat
> handling for older machines etc.) for non-obvious gains, let's
> just make CONFIG_PCI something that is always set on s390x.
>
> Note that you can still fence off pci for the _guest_ if you
> provide a cpu model without the zpci feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <address@hidden>
> ---
> Follow-up patch to the discussion around "hw/s390x: Fix the function
> arguments in the pci stub file". I've done a quick sanity test with
> tcg only so far.
> ---
> hw/s390x/Makefile.objs | 3 +-
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-stub.c | 77 -------------------------------------
> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 4 --
> target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 5 ---
> target/s390x/gen-features.c | 1 -
> target/s390x/kvm.c | 4 +-
> 6 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 hw/s390x/s390-pci-stub.c
>
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/Makefile.objs b/hw/s390x/Makefile.objs
> index a18c4719137e..bfd5326d7c3d 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/Makefile.objs
> +++ b/hw/s390x/Makefile.objs
> @@ -21,8 +21,7 @@ obj-$(call land,$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_9P),$(CONFIG_VIRTFS)) +=
> virtio-ccw-9p.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK) += vhost-vsock-ccw.o
> obj-y += css-bridge.o
> obj-y += ccw-device.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_PCI) += s390-pci-bus.o s390-pci-inst.o
> -obj-$(call lnot,$(CONFIG_PCI)) += s390-pci-stub.o
> +obj-y += s390-pci-bus.o s390-pci-inst.o
> obj-y += s390-skeys.o
> obj-y += s390-stattrib.o
> obj-y += tod.o
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-stub.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-stub.c
> deleted file mode 100644
> index ad4c5a77198f..000000000000
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-stub.c
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,77 +0,0 @@
> -/* stubs for non-pci builds */
> -
> -#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> -#include "qemu-common.h"
> -#include "cpu.h"
> -#include "s390-pci-inst.h"
> -#include "s390-pci-bus.h"
> -
> -/* target/s390x/ioinst.c */
> -int pci_chsc_sei_nt2_get_event(void *res)
> -{
> - return 1;
> -}
> -
> -int pci_chsc_sei_nt2_have_event(void)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -/* hw/s390x/sclp.c */
> -void s390_pci_sclp_configure(SCCB *sccb)
> -{
> - sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_ADAPTER_TYPE_NOT_RECOGNIZED);
> -}
> -
> -void s390_pci_sclp_deconfigure(SCCB *sccb)
> -{
> - sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_ADAPTER_TYPE_NOT_RECOGNIZED);
> -}
> -
> -/* target/s390x/kvm.c */
> -int clp_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r2)
> -{
> - return -1;
> -}
> -
> -int pcilg_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r2)
> -{
> - return -1;
> -}
> -
> -int pcistg_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r2)
> -{
> - return -1;
> -}
> -
> -int stpcifc_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint64_t fiba, uint8_t ar)
> -{
> - return -1;
> -}
> -
> -int rpcit_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r2)
> -{
> - return -1;
> -}
> -
> -int pcistb_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r3, uint64_t gaddr,
> - uint8_t ar)
> -{
> - return -1;
> -}
> -
> -int mpcifc_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint64_t fiba, uint8_t ar)
> -{
> - return -1;
> -}
> -
> -S390pciState *s390_get_phb(void)
> -{
> - return NULL;
> -}
> -
> -S390PCIBusDevice *s390_pci_find_dev_by_target(S390pciState *s,
> - const char *target)
> -{
> - return NULL;
> -}
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> index 811fdf913dd6..3fb5c88af9cc 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> @@ -272,10 +272,6 @@ static void ccw_init(MachineState *machine)
> machine->initrd_filename, "s390-ccw.img",
> "s390-netboot.img", true);
>
> - /*
> - * We cannot easily make the pci host bridge conditional as older QEMUs
> - * always created it. Doing so would break migration across QEMU
> versions.
> - */
> dev = qdev_create(NULL, TYPE_S390_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE);
> object_property_add_child(qdev_get_machine(), TYPE_S390_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE,
> OBJECT(dev), NULL);
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
> index 7c253ff308c5..249011fd62f5 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
> @@ -1314,11 +1314,6 @@ static void register_types(void)
>
> /* init all bitmaps from gnerated data initially */
> s390_init_feat_bitmap(qemu_max_cpu_feat_init, qemu_max_cpu_feat);
> -#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> - if (!pci_available) {
> - clear_bit(S390_FEAT_ZPCI, qemu_max_cpu_feat);
> - }
> -#endif
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s390_cpu_defs); i++) {
> s390_init_feat_bitmap(s390_cpu_defs[i].base_init,
> s390_cpu_defs[i].base_feat);
> diff --git a/target/s390x/gen-features.c b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> index 70015eaaf5df..b0e9b271e228 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> @@ -598,7 +598,6 @@ static uint16_t qemu_MAX[] = {
> S390_FEAT_STFLE_53,
> /* generates a dependency warning, leave it out for now */
> S390_FEAT_MSA_EXT_5,
> - /* only with CONFIG_PCI */
> S390_FEAT_ZPCI,
> };
>
> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> index 9ff80c8461d0..15fdc168e1c5 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> @@ -2278,9 +2278,7 @@ void kvm_s390_get_host_cpu_model(S390CPUModel *model,
> Error **errp)
> }
>
> /* We emulate a zPCI bus and AEN, therefore we don't need HW support */
> - if (pci_available) {
> - set_bit(S390_FEAT_ZPCI, model->features);
> - }
> + set_bit(S390_FEAT_ZPCI, model->features);
> set_bit(S390_FEAT_ADAPTER_EVENT_NOTIFICATION, model->features);
>
> if (s390_known_cpu_type(cpu_type)) {
>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
I'll send a patch that moves zPCI into the default qemu model as I'll be
touching the qemu cpu model either way.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb