[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node
From: |
Thomas Huth |
Subject: |
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Jun 2018 10:07:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 |
On 08.06.2018 09:48, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 08.06.2018 09:46, Greg Kurz wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 09:42:48 +0200
>> David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> On 08.06.2018 09:34, Greg Kurz wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 18:52:12 +0200
>>>> David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The node property can always be queried and the value has already been
>>>>> verified in pc_dimm_realize().
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 9 +--------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>>>>> index 2375cbee12..d038f3243e 100644
>>>>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>>>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>>>>> @@ -3578,14 +3578,7 @@ static void
>>>>> spapr_machine_device_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
>>>>> error_setg(errp, "Memory hotplug not supported for this
>>>>> machine");
>>>>> return;
>>>>> }
>>>>> - node = object_property_get_uint(OBJECT(dev), PC_DIMM_NODE_PROP,
>>>>> errp);
>>>>> - if (*errp) {
>>>>
>>>> Good riddance :)
>>>>
>>>>> - return;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> - if (node < 0 || node >= MAX_NODES) {
>>>>> - error_setg(errp, "Invaild node %d", node);
>>>>> - return;
>>>>> - }
Maybe turn that into an assert() instead? ... just for the paranoids ;-)
>>>>> + node = object_property_get_uint(OBJECT(dev), PC_DIMM_NODE_PROP,
>>>>> NULL);
>>>>
>>>> Maybe pass &error_abort ?
>>>
>>> I'm using the same access scheme as in hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c
>>>
>>> ("error ignored" vs. "error leads to an abort") - but this will actually
>>> never fail. But I can use error_abort here, does not matter.
>>>
>>
>> Heh, /me paranoid but this is David's call and he acked that already
>> so I guess it's okay.
>
> NULL makes it fit into a single line :)
+1 for error_abort, even if it takes another line.
Thomas
- [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 0/8] pc/spapr/s390x: machine hotplug handler cleanups, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/07
- [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 1/8] pc: local error handling in hotplug handler functions, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/07
- [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/07
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, David Gibson, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, Greg Kurz, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, Greg Kurz, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node,
Thomas Huth <=
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, Igor Mammedov, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, Igor Mammedov, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, Greg Kurz, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, Cornelia Huck, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, Greg Kurz, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, David Gibson, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/08