[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 1/7] s390x/tod: factor out TOD into separate
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 1/7] s390x/tod: factor out TOD into separate device |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jun 2018 13:10:18 +0200 |
On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 12:49:23 +0200
David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 04.06.2018 14:14, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 14:00:43 +0200
> > David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> On 04.06.2018 13:38, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 13:37:02 +0200
> >>> David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Let's treat this like a separate device. TCG will have to store the
> >>>> actual state/time later on.
> >>>>
> >>>> Include cpu-qom.h in kvm_s390x.h (due to S390CPU) to compile tod-kvm.c.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Can't you include it in tod-kvm.c instead? Why was it not needed before?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Guess I can, kvm_s390x.h looks to me like the right place, as S390CPU is
> >> used in there.
> >>
> >> All other users include "cpu.h" already, so it isn't needed.
> >
> > Hm, and for kvm_s390_irq, this file is using a forward declaration,
> > which would likely be more awkward for this structure.
>
> I remember that we wanted to use cpu-qom.h for this typedef fun, that's
> why I decided to do it this way.
>
> >
> > Header dependencies are always fun :)
> >
>
> So what do you suggest? Thanks!
>
Let's go with cpu-qom.h for this, then.