[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 3/7] s390x/tcg: properly implement the TOD
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 3/7] s390x/tcg: properly implement the TOD |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Jun 2018 13:57:18 +0200 |
On Fri, 25 May 2018 13:37:04 +0200
David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
> Right now, each CPU has its own TOD. Especially, the TOD will differ
> based on creation time of a CPU - e.g. when hotplugging a CPU the times
> will differ quite a lot, resulting in stall warnings in the guest.
>
> Let's use a single TOD by implementing our new TOD device. Prepare it
> for TOD-clock epoch extension.
>
> Most importantly, whenever we set the TOD, we have to update the CKC
> timer.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
> ---
> hw/s390x/tod-qemu.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> hw/s390x/tod.c | 11 ++++++++++
> include/hw/s390x/tod.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++
> target/s390x/cpu.c | 8 +------
> target/s390x/cpu.h | 6 ++++-
> target/s390x/internal.h | 15 -------------
> target/s390x/misc_helper.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 7 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/tod.h b/include/hw/s390x/tod.h
> index 43ed71600f..5491245b86 100644
> --- a/include/hw/s390x/tod.h
> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/tod.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,9 @@ typedef struct S390TOD {
> typedef struct S390TODState {
> /* private */
> DeviceState parent_obj;
> +
> + /* unused by KVM implementation */
> + S390TOD base;
Does this need some kind of migration handling?
> } S390TODState;
>
> typedef struct S390TODClass {
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 3/7] s390x/tcg: properly implement the TOD,
Cornelia Huck <=