[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/67] s390x: drop an unused includ
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/67] s390x: drop an unused include |
Date: |
Tue, 8 May 2018 15:23:49 +0200 |
On Fri, 4 May 2018 02:24:12 +0200
Thomas Huth <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 03.05.2018 21:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > we just need a struct name, let's add a forward
> > declaration instead of an include.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > include/hw/s390x/sclp.h | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> > index f9db243..6e65150 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> > @@ -16,7 +16,8 @@
> >
> > #include "hw/sysbus.h"
> > #include "hw/qdev.h"
> > -#include "target/s390x/cpu-qom.h"
> > +
> > +typedef struct CPUS390XState CPUS390XState;
>
> IIRC you have to use include/qemu/typedefs.h instead to avoid trouble
> with older versions of GCC.
Hm, I'm wondering why we do the typedef in cpu-qom.h, while other
architectures do it in their cpu.h.
- [qemu-s390x] [PATCH 04/67] s390x: drop an unused include, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2018/05/03
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/67] s390x: drop an unused include, Thomas Huth, 2018/05/03
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/67] s390x: drop an unused include,
Cornelia Huck <=
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/67] s390x: drop an unused include, Thomas Huth, 2018/05/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/67] s390x: drop an unused include, Cornelia Huck, 2018/05/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/67] s390x: drop an unused include, Thomas Huth, 2018/05/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/67] s390x: drop an unused include, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2018/05/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/67] s390x: drop an unused include, Thomas Huth, 2018/05/08