qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/4] target/riscv: Fix hstatus.GVA bit setting for traps take


From: Alistair Francis
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] target/riscv: Fix hstatus.GVA bit setting for traps taken from HS-mode
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 19:51:07 +1000

On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 1:38 PM Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> Currently, QEMU does not set hstatus.GVA bit for traps taken from
> HS-mode into HS-mode which breaks the Xvisor nested MMU test suite
> on QEMU. This was working previously.
>
> This patch updates riscv_cpu_do_interrupt() to fix the above issue.
>
> Fixes: 86d0c457396b ("target/riscv: Fixup setting GVA")
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>  target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> index e1aa4f2097..d83579accf 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> @@ -1434,7 +1434,6 @@ void riscv_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
>                  /* Trap into HS mode */
>                  env->hstatus = set_field(env->hstatus, HSTATUS_SPV, false);
>                  htval = env->guest_phys_fault_addr;
> -                write_gva = false;

This doesn't seem right.

"Field GVA (Guest Virtual Address) is written by the implementation
whenever a trap is taken
into HS-mode. For any trap (breakpoint, address misaligned, access
fault, page fault, or guest-
page fault) that writes a guest virtual address to stval, GVA is set
to 1. For any other trap into
HS-mode, GVA is set to 0"

So if we are trapping from HS to HS, the address in stval should not
be a guest virtual address, at least in general.

We probably aren't correctly setting GVA if MPRV is set though, as
then the page faults should be guest addresses. That's probably the
issue you are seeing.

Alistair

>              }
>              env->hstatus = set_field(env->hstatus, HSTATUS_GVA, write_gva);
>          }
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]