qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] target/ppc: powerpc_excp improvements [74xx] (5/n)


From: Fabiano Rosas
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] target/ppc: powerpc_excp improvements [74xx] (5/n)
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 20:08:49 -0300

Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> writes:

> On 27/01/2022 20:11, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>
>> Changes from v1:
>> 
>> - Restored the 'sc 1' support to avoid breaking the pegasos2 machine.
>> 
>> I tested this version in the G4 with the following OSes:
>> 
>> - Linux 5.15 (5.16 seems to be broken, even with master)
>> - FreeBSD 13
>> - Mac OS 9.2
>> - Mac OS Darwin 6.0
>> - Mac OS X 10.4
>> - MorphOS 3.15 (-M pegasos2 and -M mac99,via=pmu)
>> 
>> Based on legoater/ppc-7.0
>> 
>> v1:
>> 20220126164200.1048677-1-farosas@linux.ibm.com">https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220126164200.1048677-1-farosas@linux.ibm.com
>> 
>> Fabiano Rosas (8):
>>    target/ppc: Introduce powerpc_excp_74xx
>>    target/ppc: Simplify powerpc_excp_74xx
>>    target/ppc: 74xx: Machine Check exception cleanup
>>    target/ppc: 74xx: External interrupt cleanup
>>    target/ppc: 74xx: Program exception cleanup
>>    target/ppc: 74xx: System Call exception cleanup
>>    target/ppc: 74xx: System Reset interrupt cleanup
>>    target/ppc: 74xx: Set SRRs directly in exception code
>> 
>>   target/ppc/excp_helper.c | 197 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 197 insertions(+)
>
> That certainly covers a good range MacOS images so I'm happy to give:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
>
> Just out of curiosity have you tried booting MacOS 9.2 under KVM-PR? Last 
> time I 
> tried on my G4 Mac Mini here, OS X worked fine but 9.2 failed early after 
> jumping 
> into the 68k emulator. Unfortunately due to the split real mode (see 
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/c01e3f66cd5cdc1f727f4c7b0c10b3e3bdb91ba7
>  
> where MSR_IR != MSR_DR) I can't step through with QEMU's gdbstub to see what 
> is going 
> wrong...

Never crossed my mind actually. =)

I don't immediately see why the step wouldn't work due to split
mode. Let me understand that patch first. KVM-PR is full of surprises.

>
>
> ATB,
>
> Mark.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]