We know 'x * y' will be at most 'X_MAX * Y_MAX' (which is not
a big value, it is actually 84). Instead of having the compiler
use variable-length array, declare an array able to hold the
maximum 'x * y'.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
chardev/baum.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/chardev/baum.c b/chardev/baum.c
index adc3d7b3b56..0822e9ed5f3 100644
--- a/chardev/baum.c
+++ b/chardev/baum.c
@@ -383,9 +383,9 @@ static int baum_eat_packet(BaumChardev *baum, const uint8_t *buf, int len)
switch (req) {
case BAUM_REQ_DisplayData:
{
- uint8_t cells[baum->x * baum->y], c;
- uint8_t text[baum->x * baum->y];
- uint8_t zero[baum->x * baum->y];
+ uint8_t cells[X_MAX * Y_MAX], c;
+ uint8_t text[X_MAX * Y_MAX];
+ uint8_t zero[X_MAX * Y_MAX];
int cursor = BRLAPI_CURSOR_OFF;
int i;
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ static int baum_eat_packet(BaumChardev *baum, const uint8_t *buf, int len)
}
timer_del(baum->cellCount_timer);
- memset(zero, 0, sizeof(zero));
+ memset(zero, 0, baum->x * baum->y);
eh, I would have left the sizeof(zero)..
brlapi_writeArguments_t wa = {
.displayNumber = BRLAPI_DISPLAY_DEFAULT,
--
2.26.3