Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 3/5] spapr_cpu_core: add missing rollback on realization path

[Greg Kurz]

On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:32:44 +1000
David Gibson <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:01:47AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 09:07:24 +0200
> > Greg Kurz <address@hidden> wrote:
> >   
> > > On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 16:29:15 +1000
> > > David Gibson <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 07:58:05AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:    
> > > > > On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:14:31 +1000
> > > > > David Gibson <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > >       
> > > > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:02:25AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:      
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 11:50:42PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:        
> > > > > > > > The spapr_realize_vcpu() function doesn't rollback in case of 
> > > > > > > > error.
> > > > > > > > This isn't a problem with coldplugged CPUs because the machine 
> > > > > > > > won't
> > > > > > > > start and QEMU will exit. Hotplug is a different story though: 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > CPU thread is started under object_property_set_bool() and it 
> > > > > > > > assumes
> > > > > > > > it can access the CPU object.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > If icp_create() fails, we return an error without unregistering 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > reset handler for this CPU, and we let the underlying QEMU 
> > > > > > > > thread for
> > > > > > > > this CPU alive. Since spapr_cpu_core_realize() doesn't care to 
> > > > > > > > unrealize
> > > > > > > > already realized CPUs either, but happily frees all of them 
> > > > > > > > anyway, the
> > > > > > > > CPU thread crashes instantly:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > (qemu) device_add host-spapr-cpu-core,core-id=1,id=gku
> > > > > > > > GKU: failing icp_create (cpu 0x11497fd0)
> > > > > > > >                              ^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > > > > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > > > > > > > [Switching to Thread 0x7fffee3feaa0 (LWP 24725)]
> > > > > > > > 0x00000000104c8374 in object_dynamic_cast_assert 
> > > > > > > > (obj=0x11497fd0,
> > > > > > > >                                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > > > > >                                              pointer to the CPU 
> > > > > > > > object
> > > > > > > > 623         trace_object_dynamic_cast_assert(obj ? 
> > > > > > > > obj->class->type->name
> > > > > > > > (gdb) p obj->class->type
> > > > > > > > $1 = (Type) 0x0
> > > > > > > > (gdb) p * obj
> > > > > > > > $2 = {class = 0x10ea9c10, free = 0x11244620,
> > > > > > > >                                  ^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > > > > >                               should be g_free
> > > > > > > > (gdb) p g_free
> > > > > > > > $3 = {<text variable, no debug info>} 0x7ffff282bef0 <g_free>
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > obj is a dangling pointer to the CPU that was just destroyed in
> > > > > > > > spapr_cpu_core_realize().
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > This patch adds proper rollback to both spapr_realize_vcpu() and
> > > > > > > > spapr_cpu_core_realize().
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>        
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Applied to ppc-for-3.0, since it definitely looks to fix some
> > > > > > > problems.        
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Uh.. actually it has a definite bug - the first exit point will call
> > > > > > g_free() on an uninitialized spapr_cpu.  I fixed it up with a NULL
> > > > > > initialization in my tree.      
> > > > > 
> > > > > Ah... as said in the cover letter, all the series is based on 
> > > > > machine_data
> > > > > being set before the call to object_property_set_bool()... Maybe I 
> > > > > should
> > > > > have made that explicit with a preparatory patch... Sorry.      
> > > > 
> > > > Ah, that makes sense.
> > > > 
> > > > So, I ended up having to rework a little differently, after I yanked
> > > > by intc -> machine_data patch because it broke things for clg.  I
> > > > think I've fixed it up correctly now - if you can check the latest
> > > > ppc-for-3.0 I pushed out, that would be great.
> > > >     
> > > 
> > > I'll do this ASAP.  
> > 
> > Oops, I've just spotted a nit in my original patch, that causes
> > QEMU to crash if threads > 1... but I had only tested with single
> > threaded cores :)  
> 
> >   
> > > +err_unrealize:
> > > +    while (--j >= 0) {
> > > +        spapr_unrealize_vcpu(sc->threads[i]);  
> >                                            ^^^
> >                                        should be j  
> 
> Ah, yes.  I've fixed that up in my tree.
> 

+        spapr_unrealize_vcpu(sc->threads[j);

Almost fixed ;)

> 
> > 
> > Appart from that, it looks good.  
> 
> 
>

pgphd9P4xn8f2.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature