[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 3/5] spapr_cpu_core: add missing rollback on reali
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 3/5] spapr_cpu_core: add missing rollback on realization path |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Jun 2018 16:27:11 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17) |
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 07:53:37AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:02:25 +1000
> David Gibson <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 11:50:42PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > The spapr_realize_vcpu() function doesn't rollback in case of error.
> > > This isn't a problem with coldplugged CPUs because the machine won't
> > > start and QEMU will exit. Hotplug is a different story though: the
> > > CPU thread is started under object_property_set_bool() and it assumes
> > > it can access the CPU object.
> > >
> > > If icp_create() fails, we return an error without unregistering the
> > > reset handler for this CPU, and we let the underlying QEMU thread for
> > > this CPU alive. Since spapr_cpu_core_realize() doesn't care to unrealize
> > > already realized CPUs either, but happily frees all of them anyway, the
> > > CPU thread crashes instantly:
> > >
> > > (qemu) device_add host-spapr-cpu-core,core-id=1,id=gku
> > > GKU: failing icp_create (cpu 0x11497fd0)
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^
> > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > > [Switching to Thread 0x7fffee3feaa0 (LWP 24725)]
> > > 0x00000000104c8374 in object_dynamic_cast_assert (obj=0x11497fd0,
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > pointer to the CPU object
> > > 623 trace_object_dynamic_cast_assert(obj ? obj->class->type->name
> > > (gdb) p obj->class->type
> > > $1 = (Type) 0x0
> > > (gdb) p * obj
> > > $2 = {class = 0x10ea9c10, free = 0x11244620,
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^
> > > should be g_free
> > > (gdb) p g_free
> > > $3 = {<text variable, no debug info>} 0x7ffff282bef0 <g_free>
> > >
> > > obj is a dangling pointer to the CPU that was just destroyed in
> > > spapr_cpu_core_realize().
> > >
> > > This patch adds proper rollback to both spapr_realize_vcpu() and
> > > spapr_cpu_core_realize().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
> >
> > Applied to ppc-for-3.0, since it definitely looks to fix some
> > problems.
> >
> > > ---
> > > hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> > > index 003c4c5a79d2..04c818a6ecac 100644
> > > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> > > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> > > @@ -159,12 +159,16 @@ static void spapr_realize_vcpu(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> > > sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> > > spapr_cpu->icp = icp_create(OBJECT(cpu), spapr->icp_type,
> > > XICS_FABRIC(spapr), &local_err);
> > > if (local_err) {
> > > - goto error;
> > > + goto error_unregister;
> > > }
> > >
> > > return;
> > >
> > > +error_unregister:
> > > + qemu_unregister_reset(spapr_cpu_reset, cpu);
> > > + cpu_remove_sync(CPU(cpu));
> >
> > I'm a little unclear on exactly what init the cpu_remove_sync() is
> > mirroring, though.
> >
>
> We have the same call in spapr_unrealize_vcpu(). IIUC it is mirroring
> object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(cpu), true, "realized", &local_err).
Ok.
>
> > > error:
> > > + g_free(spapr_cpu);
> > > error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -222,11 +226,15 @@ static void spapr_cpu_core_realize(DeviceState
> > > *dev, Error **errp)
> > > for (j = 0; j < cc->nr_threads; j++) {
> > > spapr_realize_vcpu(sc->threads[j], spapr, &local_err);
> > > if (local_err) {
> > > - goto err;
> > > + goto err_unrealize;
> > > }
> > > }
> > > return;
> > >
> > > +err_unrealize:
> > > + while (--j >= 0) {
> > > + spapr_unrealize_vcpu(sc->threads[i]);
> > > + }
> > > err:
> > > while (--i >= 0) {
> > > obj = OBJECT(sc->threads[i]);
> > >
> >
>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 3/5] spapr_cpu_core: add missing rollback on realization path, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 3/5] spapr_cpu_core: add missing rollback on realization path, David Gibson, 2018/06/14
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 3/5] spapr_cpu_core: add missing rollback on realization path, David Gibson, 2018/06/14
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 3/5] spapr_cpu_core: add missing rollback on realization path, Greg Kurz, 2018/06/15
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 3/5] spapr_cpu_core: add missing rollback on realization path, David Gibson, 2018/06/15
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 3/5] spapr_cpu_core: add missing rollback on realization path, Greg Kurz, 2018/06/15
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 3/5] spapr_cpu_core: add missing rollback on realization path, Greg Kurz, 2018/06/15
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 3/5] spapr_cpu_core: add missing rollback on realization path, David Gibson, 2018/06/15
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 3/5] spapr_cpu_core: add missing rollback on realization path, Greg Kurz, 2018/06/15
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 3/5] spapr_cpu_core: add missing rollback on realization path, David Gibson, 2018/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 3/5] spapr_cpu_core: add missing rollback on realization path, Greg Kurz, 2018/06/15
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 3/5] spapr_cpu_core: add missing rollback on realization path,
David Gibson <=
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 4/5] spapr_cpu_core: introduce spapr_create_vcpu(), Greg Kurz, 2018/06/14
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 5/5] spapr_cpu_core: simplify spapr_cpu_core_realize(), Greg Kurz, 2018/06/14