[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "relaxed" `-hda file.qcow2` equivalent ?
From: |
Frantisek Rysanek |
Subject: |
Re: "relaxed" `-hda file.qcow2` equivalent ? |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Nov 2024 16:42:48 +0100 |
>
> hi,
> what is the "relaxed" equivalent of the `-hda file.qcow2` command line
> argument to control file locking (`locking=off`) ? the documentation
> says that `-hda a` can be replaced by `-drive file=a` and that locking
> can be controlled with the `locking` option of the `blockdev` argument
> : how to link `drive` and `blockdev` to obtain "relaxed" `-hda
> file.qcow2` ? regards, lacsaP.
Let me give you an example of how disk controller device and disk
drive devices are nested, i.e. the expanded form of the "-hda" arg.
I start qemu by a script, and I use shell variables to put the long
command line together. The following is a relevant excerpt of the
script.
See how the "-device" (controller) record maps to the "-drive"
records via the id= and drive= attributes:
DISK1="-drive
if=none,id=ff,cache.direct=on,aio=native,discard=unmap,detect-zeroes=u
nmap,file=/somepath/system.qcow2"
DISK2="-drive
if=none,id=fe,cache.direct=on,aio=native,discard=unmap,detect-zeroes=u
nmap,file=/somepath/data.qcow2"
DISK3="-drive
if=none,id=fd,cache.direct=on,aio=native,discard=unmap,detect-zeroes=u
nmap,file=/somepath/swap.qcow2"
HDD_STUFF="$DISK1 $DISK2 $DISK3 -device virtio-scsi-pci -device
scsi-hd,drive=ff -device scsi-hd,drive=fe -device scsi-hd,drive=fd"
In my script, those are four long lines.
Here they have wrapped... sorry :-)
I run this on top of a filesystem that supports sparse files and
snapshots, and can be told to avoid FS-level COW if it can
(= to make it prefer in-place overwrites over COW).
Now... I've found a more advanced description of image file locking
in the official current documentation here:
https://www.qemu.org/docs/master/system/qemu-block-drivers.html#disk-i
mage-file-locking
...now try to combine this with my example above :-)
Not sure what you mean by "relaxed".
Do you need to map the same image file to multiple guests?
For what purpose?
HA failover?
Both/all guests should have simultaneous write access?
Similar to multipath SCSI ? Are you playing with the GFS2/OCFS2 or
something?
Or do you mean to use the same image by multiple guests as a shared
read-only disk?
I recall reading an article ages ago, on how to create "ephemeral
fake writeable block devices" for individual guests, on top of a
shared read-only "master image"... (as multiple COW snapshots)
Frank
- "relaxed" `-hda file.qcow2` equivalent ?, lacsaP Patatetom, 2024/11/14
- Re: "relaxed" `-hda file.qcow2` equivalent ?, lacsaP Patatetom, 2024/11/14
- Re: "relaxed" `-hda file.qcow2` equivalent ?, Frantisek Rysanek, 2024/11/14
- Re: "relaxed" `-hda file.qcow2` equivalent ?, lacsaP Patatetom, 2024/11/15
- Re: "relaxed" `-hda file.qcow2` equivalent ?, Frantisek Rysanek, 2024/11/15
- Re: "relaxed" `-hda file.qcow2` equivalent ?, lacsaP Patatetom, 2024/11/15
- Re: "relaxed" `-hda file.qcow2` equivalent ?, lacsaP Patatetom, 2024/11/15
- Re: "relaxed" `-hda file.qcow2` equivalent ?, Frantisek Rysanek, 2024/11/15
Re: "relaxed" `-hda file.qcow2` equivalent ?, lacsaP Patatetom, 2024/11/14
Re: "relaxed" `-hda file.qcow2` equivalent ?,
Frantisek Rysanek <=