Re: [RFC 01/15] scripts/qapi: support type-based unions

[Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy]

On 28.03.24 12:40, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Subject: all unions are type-based.  Perhaps "support implicit union
> tags on the wire"?

Yes, sounds good.

> Do you need this schema language feature for folding block jobs into the
> jobs abstraction, or is it just for making the wire protocol nicer in
> places?

It's not necessary, we can proceed with job-* API, specifying both type and id.

But I think, as we are not in a hurry, better to make new job-* API more 
effective from the beginning.

--
Best regards,
Vladimir