|
From: | Markus Armbruster |
Subject: | Re: [RFC 01/15] scripts/qapi: support type-based unions |
Date: | Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:40:33 +0100 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Subject: all unions are type-based. Perhaps "support implicit union tags on the wire"? Do you need this schema language feature for folding block jobs into the jobs abstraction, or is it just for making the wire protocol nicer in places?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |