qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] kvm: add support for guest physical bits


From: Xiaoyao Li
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] kvm: add support for guest physical bits
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 10:44:58 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 3/18/2024 11:53 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Query kvm for supported guest physical address bits, in cpuid
function 80000008, eax[23:16].  Usually this is identical to host
physical address bits.  With NPT or EPT being used this might be
restricted to 48 (max 4-level paging address space size) even if
the host cpu supports more physical address bits.

When set pass this to the guest, using cpuid too.  Guest firmware
can use this to figure how big the usable guest physical address
space is, so PCI bar mapping are actually reachable.

Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
---
  target/i386/cpu.h         |  1 +
  target/i386/cpu.c         |  1 +
  target/i386/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.h b/target/i386/cpu.h
index 952174bb6f52..d427218827f6 100644
--- a/target/i386/cpu.h
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.h
@@ -2026,6 +2026,7 @@ struct ArchCPU {
/* Number of physical address bits supported */
      uint32_t phys_bits;
+    uint32_t guest_phys_bits;
/* in order to simplify APIC support, we leave this pointer to the
         user */
diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
index 9a210d8d9290..c88c895a5b3e 100644
--- a/target/i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
@@ -6570,6 +6570,7 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, 
uint32_t count,
          if (env->features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX] & CPUID_EXT2_LM) {
              /* 64 bit processor */
               *eax |= (cpu_x86_virtual_addr_width(env) << 8);
+             *eax |= (cpu->guest_phys_bits << 16);
          }
          *ebx = env->features[FEAT_8000_0008_EBX];
          if (cs->nr_cores * cs->nr_threads > 1) {
diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/kvm-cpu.c b/target/i386/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
index 9c791b7b0520..5132bb96abd5 100644
--- a/target/i386/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
+++ b/target/i386/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
@@ -18,10 +18,33 @@
  #include "kvm_i386.h"
  #include "hw/core/accel-cpu.h"
+static void kvm_set_guest_phys_bits(CPUState *cs)
+{
+    X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
+    uint32_t eax, guest_phys_bits;
+
+    eax = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(cs->kvm_state, 0x80000008, 0, R_EAX);
+    guest_phys_bits = (eax >> 16) & 0xff;
+    if (!guest_phys_bits) {
+        return;
+    }
+
+    if (cpu->guest_phys_bits == 0 ||
+        cpu->guest_phys_bits > guest_phys_bits) {
+        cpu->guest_phys_bits = guest_phys_bits;
+    }
+
+    if (cpu->host_phys_bits_limit &&
+        cpu->guest_phys_bits > cpu->host_phys_bits_limit) {
+        cpu->guest_phys_bits = cpu->host_phys_bits_limit;

host_phys_bits_limit takes effect only when cpu->host_phys_bits is set.

If users pass configuration like "-cpu qemu64,phys-bits=52,host-phys-bits-limit=45", the cpu->guest_phys_bits will be set to 45. I think this is not what we want, though the usage seems insane.

We can guard it as

 if (cpu->host_phys_bits && cpu->host_phys_bits_limit &&
     cpu->guest_phys_bits > cpu->host_phys_bits_limt)
{
}

Simpler, we can guard with cpu->phys_bits like below, because cpu->host_phys_bits_limit is used to guard cpu->phys_bits in host_cpu_realizefn()

 if (cpu->guest_phys_bits > cpu->phys_bits) {
        cpu->guest_phys_bits = cpu->phys_bits;
}


with this resolved,

Reviewed-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>

+    }
+}
+
  static bool kvm_cpu_realizefn(CPUState *cs, Error **errp)
  {
      X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
      CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
+    bool ret;
/*
       * The realize order is important, since x86_cpu_realize() checks if
@@ -50,7 +73,13 @@ static bool kvm_cpu_realizefn(CPUState *cs, Error **errp)
                                                     MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV);
          }
      }
-    return host_cpu_realizefn(cs, errp);
+    ret = host_cpu_realizefn(cs, errp);
+    if (!ret) {
+        return ret;
+    }
+
+    kvm_set_guest_phys_bits(cs);
+    return true;
  }
static bool lmce_supported(void)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]