qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 5/7] target/hppa: copy new_spc to iasq_f on be,n instruction


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] target/hppa: copy new_spc to iasq_f on be,n instruction
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:27:23 -1000
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 3/17/24 12:14, Sven Schnelle wrote:
Otherwise the first instruction at the new location gets executed from
the old space.

Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@stackframe.org>
---
  target/hppa/translate.c | 3 +++
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/hppa/translate.c b/target/hppa/translate.c
index 58d7ec1ade..a09112e4ae 100644
--- a/target/hppa/translate.c
+++ b/target/hppa/translate.c
@@ -3777,6 +3777,9 @@ static bool trans_be(DisasContext *ctx, arg_be *a)
          }
          copy_iaoq_entry(ctx, cpu_iaoq_b, -1, tmp);
          tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_iasq_b, new_spc);
+        if (a->n) {
+            tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_iasq_f, new_spc);
+        }
          nullify_set(ctx, a->n);
      }
      tcg_gen_lookup_and_goto_ptr();


Without use_nullify_skip(), we're going to execute the next instruction even if we know it is nullified (a->n). This is usually because there's a page crossing or breakpoint, and we need to take the exception that might be raised there.

So, we advance the queue:

        copy_iaoq_entry(ctx, cpu_iaoq_f, ctx->iaoq_b, cpu_iaoq_b);
        if (ctx->iaoq_b == -1) {
            tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_iasq_f, cpu_iasq_b);
        }

then put the branch destination at the back of the queue:

        copy_iaoq_entry(ctx, cpu_iaoq_b, -1, tmp);
        tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_iasq_b, new_spc);

Note that iaoq_b is always -1 on a space change.

So your change does not look correct.
What is the issue that you saw?


r~



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]