[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 3/7] target/hppa: fix access_id check
From: |
Richard Henderson |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 3/7] target/hppa: fix access_id check |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:12:26 -1000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 3/17/24 12:14, Sven Schnelle wrote:
+static bool match_prot_id(CPUHPPAState *env, uint32_t access_id, uint32_t
*_pid)
+{
+ for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
+ uint32_t pid = get_pid(env, i);
There are only 4 pid's for pa1.x.
+static uint32_t get_pid(CPUHPPAState *env, int num)
+{
+ const struct pid_map {
+ int reg;
+ bool shift;
+ } *pid;
+
+ const struct pid_map pids64[] = {
+ { .reg = 8, .shift = true },
+ { .reg = 8, .shift = false },
+ { .reg = 9, .shift = true },
+ { .reg = 9, .shift = false },
+ { .reg = 12, .shift = true },
+ { .reg = 12, .shift = false },
+ { .reg = 13, .shift = true },
+ { .reg = 13, .shift = false }
+ };
+
+ const struct pid_map pids32[] = {
+ { .reg = 8, .shift = false },
+ { .reg = 9, .shift = false },
+ { .reg = 12, .shift = false },
+ { .reg = 13, .shift = false },
+ };
+
+ if (hppa_is_pa20(env)) {
This predicate is fairly expensive -- you don't want to put it deep inside a
loop.
The table is very predictable. Moreover, you don't need to test these in any particular
order.
/* If bits [31:1] match, and bit 0 is set, suppress write. */
- int match = ent->access_id * 2 + 1;
-
- if (match == env->cr[CR_PID1] || match == env->cr[CR_PID2] ||
- match == env->cr[CR_PID3] || match == env->cr[CR_PID4]) {
- prot &= PAGE_READ | PAGE_EXEC;
- if (type == PAGE_WRITE) {
- ret = EXCP_DMPI;
- goto egress;
+ uint32_t pid;
+ if (match_prot_id(env, ent->access_id, &pid)) {
+ if ((pid & 1) && (prot & PROT_WRITE)) {
+ prot &= ~PROT_WRITE;
}
+ } else {
+ prot = 0;
}
You're losing the data memory protection id trap.
Therefore I suggest
/* Return the set of protections allowed by a PID match. */
static int match_prot_id_1(uint32_t access_id, uint32_t prot_id)
{
if (((access_id ^ (prot_id >> 1) & ACCESS_ID_MASK) == 0) {
return (prot_id & 1
? PROT_EXEC | PROT_READ
: PROT_EXEC | PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
}
return 0;
}
static int match_prot_id32(CPUHPPAState *env, uint32_t access_id)
{
int r, i;
for (i = CR_PID1; i <= CR_PID4; ++i) {
r = match_prot_id_1(access_id, env->cr[i]);
if (r) {
return r;
}
}
return 0;
}
static int match_prot_id64(CPUHPPAState *env, uint32_t access_id)
{
int r, i;
for (i = CR_PID1; i <= CR_PID4; ++i) {
r = match_prot_id_1(access_id, env->cr[i]);
if (r) {
return r;
}
r = match_prot_id_1(access_id, env->cr[i] >> 32);
if (r) {
return r;
}
}
return 0;
}
---
if (ent->access_id && MMU_IDX_TO_P(mmu_idx)) {
int access_prot = (hppa_is_pa20(env)
? match_prot_id64(env, ent->access_id)
: match_prot_id32(env, ent->access_id));
if (prot & ~access_prot) {
ret = EXCP_DMPI;
goto egress;
}
}
At this point there are now a couple of hppa_is_pa20() calls within
hppa_get_physical_address, which could be unified to a single local bool.
r~
- Re: [PATCH 5/7] target/hppa: copy new_spc to iasq_f on be,n instruction, (continued)
- [PATCH 2/7] target/hppa: fix shrp for wide mode, Sven Schnelle, 2024/03/17
- [PATCH 4/7] target/hppa: exit tb on flush cache instructions, Sven Schnelle, 2024/03/17
- [PATCH 3/7] target/hppa: fix access_id check, Sven Schnelle, 2024/03/17
- [PATCH 7/7] target/hppa: fix do_stdby_e(), Sven Schnelle, 2024/03/17
- [PATCH 6/7] target/hppa: mask privilege bits in mfia, Sven Schnelle, 2024/03/17