qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 3/7] target/hppa: fix access_id check


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] target/hppa: fix access_id check
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:12:26 -1000
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 3/17/24 12:14, Sven Schnelle wrote:
+static bool match_prot_id(CPUHPPAState *env, uint32_t access_id, uint32_t 
*_pid)
+{
+    for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
+        uint32_t pid = get_pid(env, i);

There are only 4 pid's for pa1.x.

+static uint32_t get_pid(CPUHPPAState *env, int num)
+{
+    const struct pid_map {
+        int reg;
+        bool shift;
+    } *pid;
+
+    const struct pid_map pids64[] = {
+        { .reg = 8,  .shift = true  },
+        { .reg = 8,  .shift = false },
+        { .reg = 9,  .shift = true  },
+        { .reg = 9,  .shift = false },
+        { .reg = 12, .shift = true  },
+        { .reg = 12, .shift = false },
+        { .reg = 13, .shift = true  },
+        { .reg = 13, .shift = false }
+    };
+
+    const struct pid_map pids32[] = {
+        { .reg = 8,  .shift = false  },
+        { .reg = 9,  .shift = false  },
+        { .reg = 12, .shift = false  },
+        { .reg = 13, .shift = false  },
+    };
+
+    if (hppa_is_pa20(env)) {

This predicate is fairly expensive -- you don't want to put it deep inside a 
loop.
The table is very predictable. Moreover, you don't need to test these in any particular order.

         /* If bits [31:1] match, and bit 0 is set, suppress write.  */
-        int match = ent->access_id * 2 + 1;
-
-        if (match == env->cr[CR_PID1] || match == env->cr[CR_PID2] ||
-            match == env->cr[CR_PID3] || match == env->cr[CR_PID4]) {
-            prot &= PAGE_READ | PAGE_EXEC;
-            if (type == PAGE_WRITE) {
-                ret = EXCP_DMPI;
-                goto egress;
+        uint32_t pid;
+        if (match_prot_id(env, ent->access_id, &pid)) {
+            if ((pid & 1) && (prot & PROT_WRITE)) {
+                prot &= ~PROT_WRITE;
             }
+        } else {
+            prot = 0;
         }

You're losing the data memory protection id trap.

Therefore I suggest

/* Return the set of protections allowed by a PID match. */
static int match_prot_id_1(uint32_t access_id, uint32_t prot_id)
{
    if (((access_id ^ (prot_id >> 1) & ACCESS_ID_MASK) == 0) {
        return (prot_id & 1
                ? PROT_EXEC | PROT_READ
                : PROT_EXEC | PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
    }
    return 0;
}

static int match_prot_id32(CPUHPPAState *env, uint32_t access_id)
{
    int r, i;
    for (i = CR_PID1; i <= CR_PID4; ++i) {
        r = match_prot_id_1(access_id, env->cr[i]);
        if (r) {
            return r;
        }
    }
    return 0;
}

static int match_prot_id64(CPUHPPAState *env, uint32_t access_id)
{
    int r, i;
    for (i = CR_PID1; i <= CR_PID4; ++i) {
        r = match_prot_id_1(access_id, env->cr[i]);
        if (r) {
            return r;
        }
        r = match_prot_id_1(access_id, env->cr[i] >> 32);
        if (r) {
            return r;
        }
    }
    return 0;
}

---

    if (ent->access_id && MMU_IDX_TO_P(mmu_idx)) {
        int access_prot = (hppa_is_pa20(env)
                           ? match_prot_id64(env, ent->access_id)
                           : match_prot_id32(env, ent->access_id));
        if (prot & ~access_prot) {
            ret = EXCP_DMPI;
            goto egress;
        }
    }

At this point there are now a couple of hppa_is_pa20() calls within hppa_get_physical_address, which could be unified to a single local bool.


r~



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]