[PATCH v4 15/23] qapi/schema: add _check_complete flag

[John Snow]

Instead of using the None value for the members field, use a dedicated
flag to detect recursive misconfigurations.

This is intended to assist with subsequent patches that seek to remove
the "None" value from the members field (which can never hold that value
after the final call to check()) in order to simplify the static typing
of that field; avoiding the need of assertions littered at many
callsites to eliminate the possibility of the None value.

Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
---
 scripts/qapi/schema.py | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/qapi/schema.py b/scripts/qapi/schema.py
index d514b3c28f6..50ebc4f12de 100644
--- a/scripts/qapi/schema.py
+++ b/scripts/qapi/schema.py
@@ -450,12 +450,13 @@ def __init__(self, name, info, doc, ifcond, features,
         self.local_members = local_members
         self.variants = variants
         self.members = None
+        self._check_complete = False
 
     def check(self, schema):
         # This calls another type T's .check() exactly when the C
         # struct emitted by gen_object() contains that T's C struct
         # (pointers don't count).
-        if self.members is not None:
+        if self._check_complete:
             # A previous .check() completed: nothing to do
             return
         if self._checked:
@@ -464,7 +465,7 @@ def check(self, schema):
                                "object %s contains itself" % self.name)
 
         super().check(schema)
-        assert self._checked and self.members is None
+        assert self._checked and not self._check_complete
 
         seen = OrderedDict()
         if self._base_name:
@@ -487,7 +488,8 @@ def check(self, schema):
             self.variants.check(schema, seen)
             self.variants.check_clash(self.info, seen)
 
-        self.members = members  # mark completed
+        self.members = members
+        self._check_complete = True  # mark completed
 
     # Check that the members of this type do not cause duplicate JSON members,
     # and update seen to track the members seen so far. Report any errors
-- 
2.44.0