Re: [PATCH v26 00/20] i386 cleanup PART 2

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

On 5/6/21 11:33 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 5/6/21 11:10 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 5/6/21 9:55 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>>> On 5/5/21 9:31 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>>> On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 02:15:29PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>>> On 5/5/21 12:04 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>>>>> Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de> writes:
>>>>>>> On 3/8/21 3:02 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>>>>>>> Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de> writes:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> anything else for me to do here?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It looks to me that this series is looking pretty good. Every patch has
>>>>>>>> at least one review so I think it's just waiting on the maintainers to
>>>>>>>> pick it up.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Paolo/Richard - are you intending to take the series as is or are you
>>>>>>>> waiting for something else? I'd like to see the patch delta reduced for
>>>>>>>> the ARM cleanup work which is still ongoing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am a bit at a loss here, as this has been reviewed for a while, but 
>>>>>>> nothing is happening.
>>>>>>> Rebasing is starting to become more and more draining;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is still the latest re-factor right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Subject: [PATCH v28 00/23] i386 cleanup PART 2
>>>>>>   Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:27:36 +0100
>>>>>>   Message-Id: <20210322132800.7470-1-cfontana@suse.de>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am seeing some changes from Phil that redo some of the patches here 
>>>>>>> (like target arch user),
>>>>>>> maybe you would like to drive this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> AIUI his changes where to get qtest passing.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hadn't read Claudio's mail, I think he's mentioning commit 46369b50ee3
>>>>>
>>>>>     meson: Introduce meson_user_arch source set for arch-specific 
>>>>> user-mode
>>>>>
>>>>>     Similarly to the 'target_softmmu_arch' source set which allows
>>>>>     to restrict target-specific sources to system emulation, add
>>>>>     the equivalent 'target_user_arch' set for user emulation.
>>>>>
>>>>> The patch only contains 6 lines in 2 hunks, if it introduced a conflict
>>>>> it should be trivial to resolve (I wasn't expecting it to conflict with
>>>>> your work when I merged it TBH).
>>
>>> I'd suggest to move the discussions about the ARM series to the arm series 
>>> thread.
>>>
>>> I am concerned here about the groundwork and x86 part.
>>
>> OK sorry, I was explaining the IRC chat.
>>
>> Is there any issue rebasing the groundwork on top of commit 46369b50ee3?
>>
>> Maybe my qtest/accel series is irrelevant to your x86 part, TBH I don't
>> remember.
> 
> So far I could rebase this series on top of commit 229a834518b
> (Mon Mar 8 15:45:48 2021).

Pfff I realized late you asked on the v26 series, but v28 is
available... Let's try again.

> First trivial conflict with 2cc1a90166b ("Remove deprecated
> target tilegx"), removing target/tilegx/meson.build resolves it.
> 
> Then apparently commit b8184135835 ("target/i386: allow modifying
> TCG phys-addr-bits") which is not trivial (to me).
> 
> Finally "meson: add target_user_arch" indeed clashes with commit
> 46369b50ee3 ("meson: Introduce meson_user_arch source set for
> arch-specific user-mode"). I am sorry I didn't notice your patch,
> but am glad we both sent a similar patch :) Mine allows optional
> sourceset, so you can simplify your patch, only keeping the x86
> part:
> 
> -- >8 --
> diff --git a/target/i386/meson.build b/target/i386/meson.build
> index fd24479590..cac26a4581 100644
> --- a/target/i386/meson.build
> +++ b/target/i386/meson.build
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ i386_softmmu_ss.add(files(
>    'machine.c',
>    'monitor.c',
>  ))
> +i386_user_ss = ss.source_set()
> 
>  subdir('kvm')
>  subdir('hax')
> @@ -28,3 +29,4 @@ subdir('tcg')
> 
>  target_arch += {'i386': i386_ss}
>  target_softmmu_arch += {'i386': i386_softmmu_ss}
> +target_user_arch += {'i386': i386_user_ss}
> ---
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Phil.
>