Re: [PATCH v26 00/20] i386 cleanup PART 2

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

On 5/6/21 9:55 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> On 5/5/21 9:31 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>> On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 02:15:29PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> On 5/5/21 12:04 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>>> Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de> writes:
>>>>> On 3/8/21 3:02 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>>>>> Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> anything else for me to do here?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It looks to me that this series is looking pretty good. Every patch has
>>>>>> at least one review so I think it's just waiting on the maintainers to
>>>>>> pick it up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Paolo/Richard - are you intending to take the series as is or are you
>>>>>> waiting for something else? I'd like to see the patch delta reduced for
>>>>>> the ARM cleanup work which is still ongoing.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am a bit at a loss here, as this has been reviewed for a while, but 
>>>>> nothing is happening.
>>>>> Rebasing is starting to become more and more draining;
>>>>
>>>> This is still the latest re-factor right?
>>>>
>>>>   Subject: [PATCH v28 00/23] i386 cleanup PART 2
>>>>   Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:27:36 +0100
>>>>   Message-Id: <20210322132800.7470-1-cfontana@suse.de>
>>>>
>>>>> I am seeing some changes from Phil that redo some of the patches here 
>>>>> (like target arch user),
>>>>> maybe you would like to drive this?
>>>>
>>>> AIUI his changes where to get qtest passing.
>>>
>>> I hadn't read Claudio's mail, I think he's mentioning commit 46369b50ee3
>>>
>>>     meson: Introduce meson_user_arch source set for arch-specific user-mode
>>>
>>>     Similarly to the 'target_softmmu_arch' source set which allows
>>>     to restrict target-specific sources to system emulation, add
>>>     the equivalent 'target_user_arch' set for user emulation.
>>>
>>> The patch only contains 6 lines in 2 hunks, if it introduced a conflict
>>> it should be trivial to resolve (I wasn't expecting it to conflict with
>>> your work when I merged it TBH).

> I'd suggest to move the discussions about the ARM series to the arm series 
> thread.
> 
> I am concerned here about the groundwork and x86 part.

OK sorry, I was explaining the IRC chat.

Is there any issue rebasing the groundwork on top of commit 46369b50ee3?

Maybe my qtest/accel series is irrelevant to your x86 part, TBH I don't
remember.

Regards,

Phil.