qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 7/8] tests/9pfs: add local Tlink test


From: Christian Schoenebeck
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] tests/9pfs: add local Tlink test
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 02:01:30 +0200

On Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2020 01:13:24 CEST Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> This test case uses a Tlink request to create a hard link to a regular
> file using the 9pfs 'local' fs driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
> ---
>  tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c b/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
> index f7d18f6274..447d8e3344 100644
> --- a/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
> +++ b/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
> @@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ static const char *rmessage_name(uint8_t id)
>          id == P9_RMKDIR ? "RMKDIR" :
>          id == P9_RLCREATE ? "RLCREATE" :
>          id == P9_RSYMLINK ? "RSYMLINK" :
> +        id == P9_RLINK ? "RLINK" :
>          id == P9_RUNLINKAT ? "RUNLINKAT" :
>          id == P9_RFLUSH ? "RFLUSH" :
>          id == P9_RREADDIR ? "READDIR" :
> @@ -742,6 +743,33 @@ static void v9fs_rsymlink(P9Req *req, v9fs_qid *qid)
>      v9fs_req_free(req);
>  }
> 
> +/* size[4] Tlink tag[2] dfid[4] fid[4] name[s] */
> +static P9Req *v9fs_tlink(QVirtio9P *v9p, uint32_t dfid, uint32_t fid,
> +                         const char *name, uint16_t tag)
> +{

This hard-link test was actually motived by an issue that I recently 
encountered on a machine: it fails to create any hard links with 9p. This 
particular test case succeeds though.

I think the problem is that recent libvirt versions enable qemu's sandbox 
feature by default which filters syscalls. Fact is, any linkat() call fails on 
that machine with EACCES now. I couldn't reproduce it on my development 
machine yet though. I guess it's a difference in white/black-list seccomp 
config or something. Not sure yet if there is some change required on 9p side 
or whether it's really just a seccomp config issue.

P.S. Noisy days from my side, but this is probably the last batch of patches 
from my side in a while, unless I really need to fix something for that hard 
link isssue. We'll see ...

Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]