qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 10/12] python/machine.py: split shutdown into hard and sof


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/12] python/machine.py: split shutdown into hard and soft flavors
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 21:10:09 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0

On 7/14/20 8:13 PM, John Snow wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/14/20 12:13 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 01:06:47AM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>>> This is done primarily to avoid the 'bare except' pattern, which
>>> suppresses all exceptions during shutdown and can obscure errors.
>>>
>>> Replace this with a pattern that isolates the different kind of shutdown
>>> paradigms (_hard_shutdown and _soft_shutdown), and a new fallback shutdown
>>> handler (_do_shutdown) that gracefully attempts one before the other.
>>>
>>> This split now also ensures that no matter what happens,
>>> _post_shutdown() is always invoked.
>>>
>>> shutdown() changes in behavior such that if it attempts to do a graceful
>>> shutdown and is unable to, it will now always raise an exception to
>>> indicate this. This can be avoided by the test writer in three ways:
>>>
>>> 1. If the VM is expected to have already exited or is in the process of
>>> exiting, wait() can be used instead of shutdown() to clean up resources
>>> instead. This helps avoid race conditions in shutdown.
>>>
>>> 2. If a test writer is expecting graceful shutdown to fail, shutdown
>>> should be called in a try...except block.
>>>
>>> 3. If the test writer has no interest in performing a graceful shutdown
>>> at all, kill() can be used instead.
>>>
>>>
>>> Handling shutdown in this way makes it much more explicit which type of
>>> shutdown we want and allows the library to report problems with this
>>> process.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>  python/qemu/machine.py | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>  1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/python/qemu/machine.py b/python/qemu/machine.py
>>> index aaa173f046..b24ce8a268 100644
>>> --- a/python/qemu/machine.py
>>> +++ b/python/qemu/machine.py
>>> @@ -48,6 +48,12 @@ class QEMUMachineAddDeviceError(QEMUMachineError):
>>>      """
>>>  
>>>  
>>> +class AbnormalShutdown(QEMUMachineError):
>>> +    """
>>> +    Exception raised when a graceful shutdown was requested, but not 
>>> performed.
>>> +    """
>>> +
>>> +
>>>  class MonitorResponseError(qmp.QMPError):
>>>      """
>>>      Represents erroneous QMP monitor reply
>>> @@ -365,6 +371,7 @@ def _early_cleanup(self) -> None:
>>>          """
>>>          Perform any cleanup that needs to happen before the VM exits.
>>>  
>>> +        May be invoked by both soft and hard shutdown in failover 
>>> scenarios.
>>>          Called additionally by _post_shutdown for comprehensive cleanup.
>>>          """
>>>          # If we keep the console socket open, we may deadlock waiting
>>> @@ -374,32 +381,90 @@ def _early_cleanup(self) -> None:
>>>              self._console_socket.close()
>>>              self._console_socket = None
>>>  
>>> +    def _hard_shutdown(self) -> None:
>>> +        """
>>> +        Perform early cleanup, kill the VM, and wait for it to terminate.
>>> +
>>> +        :raise subprocess.Timeout: When timeout is exceeds 60 seconds
>>> +            waiting for the QEMU process to terminate.
>>> +        """
>>> +        self._early_cleanup()
>>
>> Like I commented on patch 5, I don't think the *current* type of
>> cleanup done is needed on a scenario like this...
>>
>>> +        self._popen.kill()
>>
>> ... as I don't remember QEMU's SIGKILL handler to be susceptible to
>> the race condition that motivated the closing of the console file in
>> the first place.  But, I also can not prove it's not susceptible at
>> this time.
>>
> 
> It probably isn't. It was for consistency in when and where that hook is
> called, again. It does happen to be "pointless" here.
> 
>> Note: I have some old patches that added tests for QEMUMachine itself.
>> I intend to respin them on top of your work, so we may have a clearer
>> understanding of the QEMU behaviors we need to handle.  So, feel free
>> to take the prudent route here, and keep the early cleanup.
>>
> 
> Oh, adding formal tests to this folder would be incredible; especially
> if we wanted to package it on PyPI. Basically a necessity.
> 
>> Reviewed-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
>> Tested-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
>>
> 

Queuing with this hunk from jsnow:

-- >8 --
@@ -455,6 +444,9 @@ def shutdown(self, has_quit: bool = False,
         Terminate the VM (gracefully if possible) and perform cleanup.
         Cleanup will always be performed.

+        If the VM has not yet been launched, or shutdown(), wait(), or
kill()
+        have already been called, this method does nothing.
+
         :param has_quit: When true, do not attempt to issue 'quit' QMP
command.
         :param hard: When true, do not attempt graceful shutdown, and
                      suppress the SIGKILL warning log message.
---




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]