[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] tests/acceptance: add kernel record/replay test for
From: |
Alex Bennée |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] tests/acceptance: add kernel record/replay test for x86_64 |
Date: |
Wed, 27 May 2020 17:20:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.5.1; emacs 28.0.50 |
Alex Bennée <address@hidden> writes:
> Pavel Dovgalyuk <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> This patch adds a test for record/replay an execution of x86_64 machine.
>> Execution scenario includes simple kernel boot, which allows testing
>> basic hardware interaction in RR mode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Dovgalyuk <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> 0 files changed
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py
>> b/tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py
>> index b8b277ad2f..c7526f1aba 100644
>> --- a/tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py
>> +++ b/tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py
>> @@ -55,3 +55,19 @@ class ReplayKernel(LinuxKernelUtils):
>> True, shift, args)
>> self.run_vm(kernel_path, kernel_command_line, console_pattern,
>> False, shift, args)
>> +
>> + def test_x86_64_pc(self):
>> + """
>> + :avocado: tags=arch:x86_64
>> + :avocado: tags=machine:pc
>> + """
>> + kernel_url =
>> ('https://archives.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora'
>> +
>> '/linux/releases/29/Everything/x86_64/os/images/pxeboot'
>> + '/vmlinuz')
>> + kernel_hash = '23bebd2680757891cf7adedb033532163a792495'
>> + kernel_path = self.fetch_asset(kernel_url, asset_hash=kernel_hash)
>> +
>> + kernel_command_line = self.KERNEL_COMMON_COMMAND_LINE +
>> 'console=ttyS0'
>
> I note that:
>
> KERNEL_COMMON_COMMAND_LINE = 'printk.time=0 '
>
> and given we are looking for repeatability here maybe we should use our
> own command line so we can compare the recorded and replayed boot?
To build on that I think a command line like:
KERNEL_COMMON_COMMAND_LINE = 'printk.time=1 panic=-1 '
called with --no-reboot and a pattern:
console_pattern = 'VFS: Cannot open root device'
You will run more of the kernel (importantly with timestamps > 0.000) so
we can have a better compare between the recorded and replayed run.
--
Alex Bennée
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] tests/acceptance: add base class record/replay kernel tests, (continued)
[PATCH v2 04/11] tests/acceptance: add kernel record/replay test for x86_64, Pavel Dovgalyuk, 2020/05/27
Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] tests/acceptance: add kernel record/replay test for x86_64, Alex Bennée, 2020/05/27
Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] tests/acceptance: add kernel record/replay test for x86_64, Alex Bennée, 2020/05/27
[PATCH v2 05/11] tests/acceptance: add record/replay test for aarch64, Pavel Dovgalyuk, 2020/05/27
[PATCH v2 06/11] tests/acceptance: add record/replay test for arm, Pavel Dovgalyuk, 2020/05/27
[PATCH v2 07/11] tests/acceptance: add record/replay test for ppc64, Pavel Dovgalyuk, 2020/05/27