Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] tests/acceptance: add kernel record/replay test for x86_64

[Alex Bennée]

Pavel Dovgalyuk <address@hidden> writes:

> This patch adds a test for record/replay an execution of x86_64 machine.
> Execution scenario includes simple kernel boot, which allows testing
> basic hardware interaction in RR mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Dovgalyuk <address@hidden>
> ---
>  0 files changed
>
> diff --git a/tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py 
> b/tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py
> index b8b277ad2f..c7526f1aba 100644
> --- a/tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py
> +++ b/tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py
> @@ -55,3 +55,19 @@ class ReplayKernel(LinuxKernelUtils):
>                      True, shift, args)
>          self.run_vm(kernel_path, kernel_command_line, console_pattern,
>                      False, shift, args)
> +
> +    def test_x86_64_pc(self):
> +        """
> +        :avocado: tags=arch:x86_64
> +        :avocado: tags=machine:pc
> +        """
> +        kernel_url = ('https://archives.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora'
> +                      
> '/linux/releases/29/Everything/x86_64/os/images/pxeboot'
> +                      '/vmlinuz')
> +        kernel_hash = '23bebd2680757891cf7adedb033532163a792495'
> +        kernel_path = self.fetch_asset(kernel_url, asset_hash=kernel_hash)
> +
> +        kernel_command_line = self.KERNEL_COMMON_COMMAND_LINE +
> 'console=ttyS0'

I note that:

  KERNEL_COMMON_COMMAND_LINE = 'printk.time=0 '

and given we are looking for repeatability here maybe we should use our
own command line so we can compare the recorded and replayed boot?

> +        console_pattern = 'Kernel command line: %s' % kernel_command_line
> +
> +        self.run_rr(kernel_path, kernel_command_line,
> console_pattern)

-- 
Alex Bennée