Re: [PATCH REPOST v3 78/80] hostmem: fix strict bind policy

[Halil Pasic]

On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 13:07:40 +0100
Igor Mammedov <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:41:45 +0100
> Halil Pasic <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:39:25 +0100
> > Igor Mammedov <address@hidden> wrote:
[..]
> > > 
> > > one should be able to use memory-backend property to make it work
> > > instead of -m convenience option in s390 case.  
> > 
> > Thank you very much for the quick response!
> > 
> > Honestly, I overlooked the memory-backed machine property, but regardless
> > of that -machine,memory-backend=id *does not seem viable* at the
> > moment.
> > 
[..]
> > 
> > Or, am I using it wrong?
> 
> You right, 
> I even had an alternative impl. earlier that used string property
> instead of link, but later I forgot about this complication
> and simplified it to link property which works fine but only
> for -m case.
> 
> It's necessary to rewrite patches 2-4/80 to use string property
> for memory-backend which will be used for delayed backend access
> at machine_run_board_init() time.
> 
> I'll CC you on relevant patches for reviewing when I post v4.
> 

Thanks! I will give it a spin. 

Halil