qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PULL 05/20] tests/tcg/aarch64: Add pauth-4


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: [PULL 05/20] tests/tcg/aarch64: Add pauth-4
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:30:26 +0000

From: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>

Perform the set of operations and test described in LP 1859713.

Suggested-by: Adrien GRASSEIN <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
Message-id: address@hidden
[PMM: fixed hard-coded tabs]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
---
 tests/tcg/aarch64/Makefile.target |  2 +-
 tests/tcg/aarch64/pauth-4.c       | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 tests/tcg/aarch64/pauth-4.c

diff --git a/tests/tcg/aarch64/Makefile.target 
b/tests/tcg/aarch64/Makefile.target
index 374c8d6830f..efa67cf1e9e 100644
--- a/tests/tcg/aarch64/Makefile.target
+++ b/tests/tcg/aarch64/Makefile.target
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ run-fcvt: fcvt
        $(call diff-out,$<,$(AARCH64_SRC)/fcvt.ref)
 
 # Pauth Tests
-AARCH64_TESTS += pauth-1 pauth-2
+AARCH64_TESTS += pauth-1 pauth-2 pauth-4
 run-pauth-%: QEMU_OPTS += -cpu max
 pauth-%: CFLAGS += -march=armv8.3-a
 
diff --git a/tests/tcg/aarch64/pauth-4.c b/tests/tcg/aarch64/pauth-4.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1040e92aec3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/tcg/aarch64/pauth-4.c
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+#include <stdint.h>
+#include <assert.h>
+
+int main()
+{
+  uintptr_t x, y;
+
+  asm("mov %0, lr\n\t"
+      "pacia %0, sp\n\t"        /* sigill if pauth not supported */
+      "eor %0, %0, #4\n\t"      /* corrupt single bit */
+      "mov %1, %0\n\t"
+      "autia %1, sp\n\t"        /* validate corrupted pointer */
+      "xpaci %0\n\t"            /* strip pac from corrupted pointer */
+      : "=r"(x), "=r"(y));
+
+  /*
+   * Once stripped, the corrupted pointer is of the form 0x0000...wxyz.
+   * We expect the autia to indicate failure, producing a pointer of the
+   * form 0x000e....wxyz.  Use xpaci and != for the test, rather than
+   * extracting explicit bits from the top, because the location of the
+   * error code "e" depends on the configuration of virtual memory.
+   */
+  assert(x != y);
+  return 0;
+}
-- 
2.20.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]