Re: [PATCH v2 28/86] arm:raspi: use memdev for RAM

[Igor Mammedov]

On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 20:07:34 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 1/15/20 4:06 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
> > replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
> > initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
> > to memdev scheme by providing
> >    MachineClass::default_ram_id
> > and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
> > RAM memory region.
> > 
> > PS:
> >   remove no longer needed RasPiState
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > CC: address@hidden
> > CC: address@hidden
> > CC: address@hidden
> > CC: address@hidden
> > ---
> >   hw/arm/raspi.c | 34 +++++++++++++---------------------
> >   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/arm/raspi.c b/hw/arm/raspi.c
> > index 6a510aa..33ace66 100644
> > --- a/hw/arm/raspi.c
> > +++ b/hw/arm/raspi.c
> > @@ -32,11 +32,6 @@
> >   /* Table of Linux board IDs for different Pi versions */
> >   static const int raspi_boardid[] = {[1] = 0xc42, [2] = 0xc43, [3] = 
> > 0xc44};
> >   
> > -typedef struct RasPiState {
> > -    BCM283XState soc;
> > -    MemoryRegion ram;
> > -} RasPiState;
> > -
> >   static void write_smpboot(ARMCPU *cpu, const struct arm_boot_info *info)
> >   {
> >       static const uint32_t smpboot[] = {
> > @@ -166,7 +161,7 @@ static void setup_boot(MachineState *machine, int 
> > version, size_t ram_size)
> >   
> >   static void raspi_init(MachineState *machine, int version)
> >   {
> > -    RasPiState *s = g_new0(RasPiState, 1);
> > +    Object *soc;
> >       uint32_t vcram_size;
> >       DriveInfo *di;
> >       BlockBackend *blk;
> > @@ -179,30 +174,26 @@ static void raspi_init(MachineState *machine, int 
> > version)
> >           exit(1);
> >       }
> >   
> > -    object_initialize_child(OBJECT(machine), "soc", &s->soc, 
> > sizeof(s->soc),
> > -                            version == 3 ? TYPE_BCM2837 : TYPE_BCM2836,
> > -                            &error_abort, NULL);
> > +    soc = object_new(version == 3 ? TYPE_BCM2837 : TYPE_BCM2836);
> > +    object_property_add_child(OBJECT(machine), "soc", soc, &error_fatal);
> >   
> > -    /* Allocate and map RAM */
> > -    memory_region_allocate_system_memory(&s->ram, OBJECT(machine), "ram",
> > -                                         machine->ram_size);
> >       /* FIXME: Remove when we have custom CPU address space support */
> > -    memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(get_system_memory(), 0, &s->ram, 
> > 0);
> > +    memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(get_system_memory(), 0,
> > +                                        machine->ram, 0);
> >   
> >       /* Setup the SOC */
> > -    object_property_add_const_link(OBJECT(&s->soc), "ram", OBJECT(&s->ram),
> > +    object_property_add_const_link(soc, "ram", OBJECT(machine->ram),
> >                                      &error_abort);
> > -    object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&s->soc), machine->smp.cpus, 
> > "enabled-cpus",
> > +    object_property_set_int(soc, machine->smp.cpus, "enabled-cpus",
> >                               &error_abort);
> >       int board_rev = version == 3 ? 0xa02082 : 0xa21041;
> > -    object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&s->soc), board_rev, "board-rev",
> > -                            &error_abort);
> > -    object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&s->soc), true, "realized", 
> > &error_abort);
> > +    object_property_set_int(soc, board_rev, "board-rev", &error_abort);
> > +    object_property_set_bool(soc, true, "realized", &error_abort);
> >   
> >       /* Create and plug in the SD cards */
> >       di = drive_get_next(IF_SD);
> >       blk = di ? blk_by_legacy_dinfo(di) : NULL;
> > -    bus = qdev_get_child_bus(DEVICE(&s->soc), "sd-bus");
> > +    bus = qdev_get_child_bus(DEVICE(soc), "sd-bus");
> >       if (bus == NULL) {
> >           error_report("No SD bus found in SOC object");
> >           exit(1);
> > @@ -211,8 +202,7 @@ static void raspi_init(MachineState *machine, int 
> > version)
> >       qdev_prop_set_drive(carddev, "drive", blk, &error_fatal);
> >       object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(carddev), true, "realized", 
> > &error_fatal);
> >   
> > -    vcram_size = object_property_get_uint(OBJECT(&s->soc), "vcram-size",
> > -                                          &error_abort);
> > +    vcram_size = object_property_get_uint(soc, "vcram-size", &error_abort);
> >       setup_boot(machine, version, machine->ram_size - vcram_size);
> >   }
> >   
> > @@ -233,6 +223,7 @@ static void raspi2_machine_init(MachineClass *mc)
> >       mc->min_cpus = BCM283X_NCPUS;
> >       mc->default_cpus = BCM283X_NCPUS;
> >       mc->default_ram_size = 1 * GiB;
> > +    mc->default_ram_id = "ram";
> >       mc->ignore_memory_transaction_failures = true;
> >   };
> >   DEFINE_MACHINE("raspi2", raspi2_machine_init)
> > @@ -255,6 +246,7 @@ static void raspi3_machine_init(MachineClass *mc)
> >       mc->min_cpus = BCM283X_NCPUS;
> >       mc->default_cpus = BCM283X_NCPUS;
> >       mc->default_ram_size = 1 * GiB;
> > +    mc->default_ram_id = "ram";
> >   }
> >   DEFINE_MACHINE("raspi3", raspi3_machine_init)
> >   #endif
> >   
> 
> This patch diverges a lot from my current work:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg653818.html
perhaps we could generalize size checks on top of that.
there were some ideas in that direction in
  "[PATCH v2 66/86] ppc/{ppc440_bamboo,sam460x}: drop RAM size fixup"
thread


> So I'm not very happy about it. Maybe my bad I should ping more 
> aggressively my patches. I can respin mine preparing for your series on top.

this patch is trivial,
if your patches merged before this, than I'll just rebase.


> 
> Meanwhile if you are in a hurry I tested yours, so:
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
> Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
> 
>