qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/6] s390x/mmu: Storage key reference and cha


From: Cornelia Huck
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/6] s390x/mmu: Storage key reference and change bit handling
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 11:46:41 +0200

On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:47:02 +0200
David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:

> The first two patches are modified patches from:
>     [PATCH-for-4.2 v1 0/9] s390x: MMU changes and extensions
> 
> This series primarily fixes minor things in the storage key handling code
> in the MMU and implements fairly reliable reference and change bit handling
> for TCG. To track the reference and change bit, we have to invalidate
> TLB entries whenever the storage key is changed by the guest and make sure
> not TLB entry is writable in case the storage key does not indicate a
> change already.
> 
> With this series, the kvm-unit-test "skey" now passes. \o/
> 
> v2 -> v3:
> - Reshuffled patches to avoid a temporary uninitialized return value
> - Minor updates to patch descriptions
> - "s390x/tcg: Flush the TLB of all CPUs on SSKE and RRBE"
> -- Updated comments
> - "s390x/mmu: Factor out storage key handling"
> -- Reduce indentation
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> - "s390x/tcg: Rework MMU selection for instruction fetches"
> -- Cleanup return value handling
> - Added RB's
> 
> Cc: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
> 
> David Hildenbrand (6):
>   s390x/mmu: Trace the right value if setting/getting the storage key
>     fails
>   s390x/mmu: ASC selection in s390_cpu_get_phys_page_debug()
>   s390x/tcg: Rework MMU selection for instruction fetches
>   s390x/tcg: Flush the TLB of all CPUs on SSKE and RRBE
>   s390x/mmu: Better storage key reference and change bit handling
>   s390x/mmu: Factor out storage key handling
> 
>  target/s390x/cpu.h        |   7 ++
>  target/s390x/helper.c     |   5 ++
>  target/s390x/mem_helper.c |  10 +++
>  target/s390x/mmu_helper.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  4 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
> 

Looks good to me now.

I can pick this up directly, or you can send me a pull request
(whichever you prefer).



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]