[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: equation is more proper than and to
From: |
Dr. David Alan Gilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: equation is more proper than and to check LOADVM_QUIT |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Aug 2019 18:50:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) |
* Wei Yang (address@hidden) wrote:
> LOADVM_QUIT allows a command to quit all layers of nested loadvm loops,
> while current return value check is not that proper even it works now.
>
> Current return value check "ret & LOADVM_QUIT" would return true if
> bit[0] is 1. This would be true when ret is -1 which is used to indicate
> an error of handling a command.
>
> Since there is only one place return LOADVM_QUIT and no other
> combination of return value, use "ret == LOADVM_QUIT" would be more
> proper.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <address@hidden>
Queued
> ---
> migration/savevm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/savevm.c b/migration/savevm.c
> index 1a9b1f411e..25fe7ea05a 100644
> --- a/migration/savevm.c
> +++ b/migration/savevm.c
> @@ -2429,7 +2429,7 @@ retry:
> case QEMU_VM_COMMAND:
> ret = loadvm_process_command(f);
> trace_qemu_loadvm_state_section_command(ret);
> - if ((ret < 0) || (ret & LOADVM_QUIT)) {
> + if ((ret < 0) || (ret == LOADVM_QUIT)) {
> goto out;
> }
> break;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: equation is more proper than and to check LOADVM_QUIT,
Dr. David Alan Gilbert <=