[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] ]Re: [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken - solved?
From: |
Aleksandar Markovic |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] ]Re: [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken - solved? |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Aug 2019 19:58:08 +0000 |
> > it shows very low coverage for our FP code (softfloat), while, in
> > fact, we know that "make check" contains detailed tests on FP
> > functionalities. But this is most likely a separate problem of a very
> > different nature, perhaps the issue of separate git repo for FP tests
> > (testfloat) that our FP tests use as a mid-layer.
>
> I get:
>
> 68.6 % 2593 / 3782 62.2 % 1690 / 2718
>
This problem is solved too. (and it is my fault)
I worked with multiple versions of QEMU, and my previous low-coverage results
were for QEMU 3.0, and for that version the directory tests/fp did not even
exist. :D (<blush>)
For QEMU ToT, I get now:
fpu/softfloat.c
68.8 % 2592 / 3770 62.3 % 1693 / 2718
which is identical for all intents and purposes to your result.
Yours cordially,
Aleksandar
- [Qemu-devel] [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken, Aleksandar Markovic, 2019/08/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken, Peter Maydell, 2019/08/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken, Alex Bennée, 2019/08/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken, Aleksandar Markovic, 2019/08/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken, Aleksandar Markovic, 2019/08/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken - solved?, Aleksandar Markovic, 2019/08/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken - solved?, Alex Bennée, 2019/08/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken - solved?, Aleksandar Markovic, 2019/08/05
- [Qemu-devel] ]Re: [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken - solved?,
Aleksandar Markovic <=