[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken - solved?
From: |
Aleksandar Markovic |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken - solved? |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Aug 2019 19:31:50 +0000 |
> > it shows very low coverage for our FP code (softfloat), while, in
> > fact, we know that "make check" contains detailed tests on FP
> > functionalities. But this is most likely a separate problem of a very
> > different nature, perhaps the issue of separate git repo for FP tests
> > (testfloat) that our FP tests use as a mid-layer.
>
> I get:
>
> 68.6 % 2593 / 3782 62.2 % 1690 / 2718
>
I would expect that kind of result too.
However, I get:
File: fpu/softfloat.c Lines: 8 3334 0.2 %
Date: 2019-08-05 19:56:58 Branches: 3 2376 0.1 %
:(
OK, I'll try to figure that out, and most likely I could live with it if it is
an isolated problem.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter,
Aleksandar
> Which is not bad considering we don't exercise the 80 and 128 bit
> softfloat code at all (which is not shared by the re-factored 16/32/64
> bit code).
>
> Alex Bennée
- [Qemu-devel] [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken, Aleksandar Markovic, 2019/08/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken, Peter Maydell, 2019/08/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken, Alex Bennée, 2019/08/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken, Aleksandar Markovic, 2019/08/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken, Aleksandar Markovic, 2019/08/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken - solved?, Aleksandar Markovic, 2019/08/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken - solved?, Alex Bennée, 2019/08/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken - solved?,
Aleksandar Markovic <=
- [Qemu-devel] ]Re: [BUG] gcov support appears to be broken - solved?, Aleksandar Markovic, 2019/08/05