[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Soft feature freeze for 1.0 is 10/15 (three weeks
From: |
Blue Swirl |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Soft feature freeze for 1.0 is 10/15 (three weeks away) |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:39:42 +0000 |
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Avi Kivity <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 09/27/2011 11:33 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>> On 09/26/2011 09:07 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>>
>>> >> The default address is used for early serial printk in OpenBIOS, so
>>> >> it
>>> >> should still work.
>>> >
>>> > Ok, so drop the extra mapping, but init the dynamic mapping to
>>> > 0x80013000.
>>>
>>> That should work.
>>
>> It's already there (macio.c):
>>
>> if (macio_state->escc_mem) {
>> memory_region_add_subregion(bar, 0x13000, macio_state->escc_mem);
>> }
>>
>> I'll drop the extra mapping.
>>
>
> Well, it's not that easy. As the other mapping is part of an ordinary BAR,
> you need to setup the device (at least PCI_COMMAND and PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0)
> so it responds to memory requests, and also enable the bridge.
>
> We could hack it by having a low-priority mapping at 0x80013000, but it
> seems wrong. Maybe the firmware should configure that BAR first? What
> happens on real hardware?
In this message I seem to confess that the address is arbitrary and in
the subsequent messages the overlap with PCI region is also discussed.
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-01/msg00542.html
Maybe the address of macio should be fixed as Laurent suggested.
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Soft feature freeze for 1.0 is 10/15 (three weeks away), (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Soft feature freeze for 1.0 is 10/15 (three weeks away), Blue Swirl, 2011/09/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Soft feature freeze for 1.0 is 10/15 (three weeks away), Avi Kivity, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Soft feature freeze for 1.0 is 10/15 (three weeks away), Avi Kivity, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Soft feature freeze for 1.0 is 10/15 (three weeks away), Blue Swirl, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Soft feature freeze for 1.0 is 10/15 (three weeks away), Avi Kivity, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Soft feature freeze for 1.0 is 10/15 (three weeks away), Blue Swirl, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Soft feature freeze for 1.0 is 10/15 (three weeks away), Avi Kivity, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Soft feature freeze for 1.0 is 10/15 (three weeks away), Blue Swirl, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Soft feature freeze for 1.0 is 10/15 (three weeks away), Avi Kivity, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Soft feature freeze for 1.0 is 10/15 (three weeks away), Avi Kivity, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Soft feature freeze for 1.0 is 10/15 (three weeks away),
Blue Swirl <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Soft feature freeze for 1.0 is 10/15 (three weeks away), Avi Kivity, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Soft feature freeze for 1.0 is 10/15 (three weeks away), Blue Swirl, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Soft feature freeze for 1.0 is 10/15 (three weeks away), Alexander Graf, 2011/09/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Soft feature freeze for 1.0 is 10/15 (three weeks away), Blue Swirl, 2011/09/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Soft feature freeze for 1.0 is 10/15 (three weeks away), Alexander Graf, 2011/09/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Soft feature freeze for 1.0 is 10/15 (three weeks away), Anthony Liguori, 2011/09/25
Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Soft feature freeze for 1.0 is 10/15 (three weeks away), Stefan Berger, 2011/09/29