[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Protect outbuf from concurrent access
From: |
Gerd Hoffmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Protect outbuf from concurrent access |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Sep 2011 15:39:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110805 Red Hat/3.1.12-1.el6_1 Thunderbird/3.1.12 |
Hi,
After some investigation, I found out that the problem is that different
SPICE threads are calling monitor functions (such as
monitor_protocol_event()) in parallel which causes concurrent access
to the monitor's internal buffer outbuf[].
[ adding spice-list to Cc, see qemu-devel for the rest of the thread ]
spice isn't supposed to do that.
/me just added a assert in channel_event() and saw it trigger in display
channel disconnects.
#0 0x0000003ceba32a45 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x0000003ceba34225 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2 0x0000003ceba2b9d5 in __assert_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#3 0x0000000000503759 in channel_event (event=3, info=0x35e9340)
at /home/kraxel/projects/qemu/ui/spice-core.c:223
#4 0x00007f9a77a9921b in reds_channel_event (s=0x35e92c0) at reds.c:400
#5 reds_stream_free (s=0x35e92c0) at reds.c:4981
#6 0x00007f9a77aac8b0 in red_disconnect_channel
(channel=0x7f9a24069a80) at red_worker.c:8489
#7 0x00007f9a77ab53a8 in handle_dev_input (listener=0x7f9a3211ab20,
events=<value optimized out>)
at red_worker.c:10062
#8 0x00007f9a77ab436d in red_worker_main (arg=<value optimized out>) at
red_worker.c:10304
#9 0x0000003cec2077e1 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#10 0x0000003cebae68ed in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
IMHO spice server should handle the display channel tear-down in the
dispatcher instead of the worker thread. Alon?
Anyways, this commit fixes the problem at hand.
Not really. channel_event() itself isn't thread-safe too, it does
unlocked list operations which can also blow up when called from
different threads.
A patch like the attached (warning: untested) should do as quick&dirty
fix for stable. But IMO we really should fix spice instead.
cheers,
Gerd
0001-spice-workaround-a-spice-server-bug.patch
Description: Text document
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Protect outbuf from concurrent access, Luiz Capitulino, 2011/09/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Protect outbuf from concurrent access, Daniel P. Berrange, 2011/09/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Protect outbuf from concurrent access, Jan Kiszka, 2011/09/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Protect outbuf from concurrent access, Anthony Liguori, 2011/09/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Protect outbuf from concurrent access, Daniel P. Berrange, 2011/09/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Protect outbuf from concurrent access,
Gerd Hoffmann <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Protect outbuf from concurrent access, Anthony Liguori, 2011/09/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Protect outbuf from concurrent access, Luiz Capitulino, 2011/09/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Protect outbuf from concurrent access, Anthony Liguori, 2011/09/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Protect outbuf from concurrent access, Gerd Hoffmann, 2011/09/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Protect outbuf from concurrent access, Anthony Liguori, 2011/09/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Protect outbuf from concurrent access, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/09/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Protect outbuf from concurrent access, Anthony Liguori, 2011/09/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Protect outbuf from concurrent access, Gerd Hoffmann, 2011/09/05