Re: [Qemu-devel] Modular qemu?

[Salvatore Lionetti]

>Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> This has been discussed before and I believe the overall consensus was
>> that plugins are not desirable.
>> 
>> With respect to the various forks of QEMU, I believe the real problem is
>> that historically, people have had a tough time getting changes into
>> QEMU.  This is not just a matter of getting patches accepted, but also
>> getting the appropriate guidance about how to refactor things to take
>> into account all of the various architecture combinations that QEMU
>> supports and some of the longer term efforts.
>> 
>> I hope this situation is improving.  If people have feedback in how
>> things could be improved, I think everyone is eager to here it.  Plugins
>> are not the solution though.
>> 
>
>
>I think that getting patches accepted (or at least reviewed) is far more
>important than plugins or shared libraries.
>>From my point of view surely the situation has improved a lot recently
>on this aspect.