qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] block-backend: Introduce blk_get_guest_block_size()


From: Yongji Xie
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] block-backend: Introduce blk_get_guest_block_size()
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 16:03:22 +0800

On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 9:17 PM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 03:40:45PM +0800, Xie Yongji wrote:
> > Support getting the guest block size for the block backend.
> > It's needed for the following commit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
> > ---
> >  block/block-backend.c             | 6 ++++++
> >  include/sysemu/block-backend-io.h | 1 +
> >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/block-backend.c b/block/block-backend.c
> > index 35457a6a1d..1582ff81c9 100644
> > --- a/block/block-backend.c
> > +++ b/block/block-backend.c
> > @@ -2106,6 +2106,12 @@ void blk_set_guest_block_size(BlockBackend *blk, int 
> > align)
> >      blk->guest_block_size = align;
> >  }
> >
> > +int blk_get_guest_block_size(BlockBackend *blk)
> > +{
> > +    IO_CODE();
> > +    return blk->guest_block_size;
>
> I have sent a patch to remove blk->guest_block_size because this field
> is currently unused.
>

OK.

> I think there is a cleaner way for this patch series to store the guest
> logical_block_size (see next patch). Stashing it in BlockBackend was
> attractive because virtio-blk-handler.c lacks a struct to store its
> parameters (writable, serial, logical_block_size), but if such a struct
> is introduced then there's no need to stash it in BlockBackend.
>

Looks good to me.

Thanks,
Yongji



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]