[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 6/9] hw/block/pflash_cfi02: Rename register_memory(true) as m
From: |
David Edmondson |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 6/9] hw/block/pflash_cfi02: Rename register_memory(true) as mode_read_array |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:59:42 +0000 |
On Wednesday, 2021-03-10 at 00:50:25 +01, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> The same pattern is used when setting the flash in READ_ARRAY mode:
> - Set the state machine command to READ_ARRAY
> - Reset the write_cycle counter
> - Reset the memory region in ROMD
>
> Refactor the current code by extracting this pattern.
> It is used three times:
>
> - When the timer expires and not in bypass mode
>
> - On a read access (on invalid command).
>
> - When the device is initialized. Here the ROMD mode is hidden
> by the memory_region_init_rom_device() call.
>
> pflash_register_memory(rom_mode=true) already sets the ROM device
> in "read array" mode (from I/O device to ROM one). Explicit that
> by renaming the function as pflash_mode_read_array(), adding
> a trace event and resetting wcycle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
Okay, I see that pflash_register_memory() was going to lose its second
argument anyway, so perhaps no need to fix it in the previous patch.
> ---
> hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> hw/block/trace-events | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c b/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
> index 4efbae2f0c9..2ba77a0171b 100644
> --- a/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
> +++ b/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
> @@ -184,10 +184,13 @@ static void pflash_setup_mappings(PFlashCFI02 *pfl)
> pfl->rom_mode = true;
> }
>
> -static void pflash_register_memory(PFlashCFI02 *pfl, int rom_mode)
> +static void pflash_mode_read_array(PFlashCFI02 *pfl)
> {
> - memory_region_rom_device_set_romd(&pfl->orig_mem, rom_mode);
> - pfl->rom_mode = rom_mode;
> + trace_pflash_mode_read_array();
> + pfl->cmd = 0x00;
> + pfl->wcycle = 0;
> + pfl->rom_mode = true;
> + memory_region_rom_device_set_romd(&pfl->orig_mem, true);
> }
>
> static size_t pflash_regions_count(PFlashCFI02 *pfl)
> @@ -249,11 +252,10 @@ static void pflash_timer(void *opaque)
> toggle_dq7(pfl);
> if (pfl->bypass) {
> pfl->wcycle = 2;
> + pfl->cmd = 0;
> } else {
> - pflash_register_memory(pfl, 1);
> - pfl->wcycle = 0;
> + pflash_mode_read_array(pfl);
> }
> - pfl->cmd = 0;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -315,7 +317,7 @@ static uint64_t pflash_read(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
> unsigned int width)
> /* Lazy reset to ROMD mode after a certain amount of read accesses */
> if (!pfl->rom_mode && pfl->wcycle == 0 &&
> ++pfl->read_counter > PFLASH_LAZY_ROMD_THRESHOLD) {
> - pflash_register_memory(pfl, 1);
> + pflash_mode_read_array(pfl);
> }
> offset &= pfl->chip_len - 1;
> boff = offset & 0xFF;
> @@ -933,8 +935,6 @@ static void pflash_cfi02_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
> **errp)
> sysbus_init_mmio(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev), &pfl->mem);
>
> timer_init_ns(&pfl->timer, QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL, pflash_timer, pfl);
> - pfl->wcycle = 0;
> - pfl->cmd = 0;
> pfl->status = 0;
>
> pflash_cfi02_fill_cfi_table(pfl, nb_regions);
> diff --git a/hw/block/trace-events b/hw/block/trace-events
> index d32475c3989..f16d6e90cfd 100644
> --- a/hw/block/trace-events
> +++ b/hw/block/trace-events
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ fdc_ioport_write(uint8_t reg, uint8_t value) "write reg
> 0x%02x val 0x%02x"
> # pflash_cfi01.c
> # pflash_cfi02.c
> pflash_reset(void) "reset"
> +pflash_mode_read_array(void) "mode: read array"
> pflash_timer_expired(uint8_t cmd) "command 0x%02x done"
> pflash_io_read(uint64_t offset, unsigned size, uint32_t value, uint8_t cmd,
> uint8_t wcycle) "offset:0x%04"PRIx64" size:%u value:0x%04x cmd:0x%02x
> wcycle:%u"
> pflash_io_write(uint64_t offset, unsigned size, uint32_t value, uint8_t
> wcycle) "offset:0x%04"PRIx64" size:%u value:0x%04x wcycle:%u"
> --
> 2.26.2
dme.
--
Ah, oh your hair is beautiful.