On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:30 PM Alistair Francis <
alistair23@gmail.com> wrote:
> +
> + object_class_property_add_str(oc, "density", stm32f100_get_density,
> + stm32f100_set_density);
> + object_class_property_set_description(oc, "density",
> + "Set the STM32F100 density line device. "
> + "Valid values are 'low', 'medium', and 'high' (default).");
> }
This should be split into a separate commit from adding the machine
Ok, I'll do that.
Isn't this exactly the same as the stm32vldiscovery board? Which is
already very similar to the netduino2 machine. I'm not sure we need
another machine.
It could make more sense to deprecate the stm32vldiscovery machine and
replace it with this generic one. At least we could keep everything in
the one file and reuse a lot of the code.
What is the protocol for deprecating a machine? Should I just submit a patch that removes it along with the corresponding entry in the MAINTAINERS file? Should I coordinate that offline with the maintainer of the machine that's to be retired?
Thanks,
Lucas