Re: [PATCH v2] hw/display/xlnx_dp: fix an out-of-bounds read in xlnx_dp_read

[Gerd Hoffmann]

  Hi,

> As a side note(not strictly related to this fix) should we continue
> joining reproducer patches with the fixes? In order to test the
> reproducer, you need to cleave the fix off the patch. At the same time
> we don't want to mess up bisection, so does it make sense to have the
> reproducer patch be separate but come last in the series?

Yes, I think it makes sense to send the testcase as separate patch, and
the ordering (fix first, testcase second) makes sense too.  If they are
separated it is easy enough to create a local test branch with a
different order, or to just temporarily revert the fix to test the
testcase.

take care,
  Gerd