[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible? |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:02:22 +0000 |
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 14:27, Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de> wrote:
> the "max" cpu in x86 and s390 is a class,
>
> and then "host" has "max" as parent.
>
> This would be a convenient setup for ARM too, as it would allow to put common
> code between kvm and tcg in the "max" class,
> and allow "host" to specialize the behavior for KVM (and in the future HVF
> probably).
>
> Would changing the class hierarchy this way be acceptable, cause any problems?
It's not clear to me why 'host' would be a subtype of 'max':
that doesn't seem like an obvious relationship.
thanks
-- PMM
- arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?, Claudio Fontana, 2021/03/11
- Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?,
Peter Maydell <=
- Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?, Claudio Fontana, 2021/03/11
- Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?, Paolo Bonzini, 2021/03/11
- Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?, Claudio Fontana, 2021/03/11
- Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?, Eduardo Habkost, 2021/03/11
- Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?, Peter Maydell, 2021/03/11
- Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?, Andrew Jones, 2021/03/11
- arm_cpu_post_init (Was: Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?), Claudio Fontana, 2021/03/18
- Re: arm_cpu_post_init (Was: Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?), Claudio Fontana, 2021/03/18
- Re: arm_cpu_post_init (Was: Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?), Andrew Jones, 2021/03/18