[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?
From: |
Claudio Fontana |
Subject: |
arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible? |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:27:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 |
Hi Peter,
the "max" cpu in x86 and s390 is a class,
and then "host" has "max" as parent.
This would be a convenient setup for ARM too, as it would allow to put common
code between kvm and tcg in the "max" class,
and allow "host" to specialize the behavior for KVM (and in the future HVF
probably).
Would changing the class hierarchy this way be acceptable, cause any problems?
I ask specifically because on the x86 side I had to limit my changes to the
hierarchy to adding objects,
but I would not change the relationship between them.
Thanks,
Claudio
--
Claudio Fontana
Engineering Manager Virtualization, SUSE Labs Core
SUSE Software Solutions Italy Srl
- arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?,
Claudio Fontana <=
- Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?, Peter Maydell, 2021/03/11
- Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?, Claudio Fontana, 2021/03/11
- Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?, Paolo Bonzini, 2021/03/11
- Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?, Claudio Fontana, 2021/03/11
- Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?, Eduardo Habkost, 2021/03/11
- Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?, Peter Maydell, 2021/03/11
- Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?, Andrew Jones, 2021/03/11
- arm_cpu_post_init (Was: Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?), Claudio Fontana, 2021/03/18
- Re: arm_cpu_post_init (Was: Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?), Claudio Fontana, 2021/03/18