[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 8/8] hw: acpi: Remove AcpiRsdpDesc
From: |
Andrew Jones |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 8/8] hw: acpi: Remove AcpiRsdpDescriptor and fix tests |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Nov 2018 16:07:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20180716 |
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 02:24:28PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> The only remaining AcpiRsdpDescriptor users are the ACPI utils for the
> BIOS table tests.
> We remove that dependency and can thus remove the structure itself.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <address@hidden>
> ---
> include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h | 13 -----------
> tests/acpi-utils.h | 5 +++-
> tests/acpi-utils.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> tests/bios-tables-test.c | 27 +++++++++++++++-------
> tests/vmgenid-test.c | 8 ++++---
> 5 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h b/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h
> index 8425ecb8c6..5021cb9e79 100644
> --- a/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h
> +++ b/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h
> @@ -40,19 +40,6 @@ enum {
> ACPI_FADT_F_LOW_POWER_S0_IDLE_CAPABLE,
> };
>
> -struct AcpiRsdpDescriptor { /* Root System Descriptor Pointer */
> - uint64_t signature; /* ACPI signature, contains "RSD PTR "
> */
> - uint8_t checksum; /* To make sum of struct == 0 */
> - uint8_t oem_id [6]; /* OEM identification */
> - uint8_t revision; /* Must be 0 for 1.0, 2 for 2.0 */
> - uint32_t rsdt_physical_address; /* 32-bit physical address of RSDT */
> - uint32_t length; /* XSDT Length in bytes including hdr */
> - uint64_t xsdt_physical_address; /* 64-bit physical address of XSDT */
> - uint8_t extended_checksum; /* Checksum of entire table */
> - uint8_t reserved [3]; /* Reserved field must be 0 */
> -} QEMU_PACKED;
> -typedef struct AcpiRsdpDescriptor AcpiRsdpDescriptor;
> -
> typedef struct AcpiRsdpData {
> uint8_t oem_id[6]; /* OEM identification */
> uint8_t revision; /* Must be 0 for 1.0, 2 for 2.0 */
> diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.h b/tests/acpi-utils.h
> index ac52abd0dd..c26c8976a6 100644
> --- a/tests/acpi-utils.h
> +++ b/tests/acpi-utils.h
> @@ -82,6 +82,9 @@ typedef struct {
>
> uint8_t acpi_calc_checksum(const uint8_t *data, int len);
> uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(void);
> -void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(uint32_t addr, AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table);
> +uint32_t acpi_get_rsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table);
> +uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table);
> +void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(uint32_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table,
> + uint8_t revision);
>
> #endif /* TEST_ACPI_UTILS_H */
> diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.c b/tests/acpi-utils.c
> index 41dc1ea9b4..b1113bda8b 100644
> --- a/tests/acpi-utils.c
> +++ b/tests/acpi-utils.c
> @@ -52,14 +52,44 @@ uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(void)
> return off;
> }
>
> -void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(uint32_t addr, AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table)
> +uint32_t acpi_get_rsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table)
> {
> - ACPI_READ_FIELD(rsdp_table->signature, addr);
> - ACPI_ASSERT_CMP64(rsdp_table->signature, "RSD PTR ");
> + uint32_t rsdt_physical_address;
> + uint8_t revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */];
>
> - ACPI_READ_FIELD(rsdp_table->checksum, addr);
> - ACPI_READ_ARRAY(rsdp_table->oem_id, addr);
> - ACPI_READ_FIELD(rsdp_table->revision, addr);
> - ACPI_READ_FIELD(rsdp_table->rsdt_physical_address, addr);
> - ACPI_READ_FIELD(rsdp_table->length, addr);
> + if (revision != 0) { /* ACPI 1.0 RSDP */
> + return 0;
> + }
So now we assume a zero offset can't be valid, which means we don't need
pointers in the struct. Your answer that pointers are used for consistency
is good enough for me though.
> +
> + memcpy(&rsdt_physical_address, &rsdp_table[16 /* RsdtAddress offset */],
> 4);
> + return le32_to_cpu(rsdt_physical_address);
> +}
> +
> +uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table)
> +{
> + uint64_t xsdt_physical_address;
> + uint8_t revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */];
> +
> + if (revision != 2) { /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP */
revision < 2
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + memcpy(&xsdt_physical_address, &rsdp_table[24 /* XsdtAddress offset */],
> 8);
> + return le64_to_cpu(xsdt_physical_address);
> +}
> +
> +void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(uint32_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table, uint8_t
> revision)
> +{
> + switch (revision) {
> + case 0: /* ACPI 1.0 RSDP */
> + memread(addr, rsdp_table, 20);
> + break;
> + case 2: /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP */
> + memread(addr, rsdp_table, 36);
> + break;
> + default:
> + g_assert_not_reached();
> + }
> +
> + ACPI_ASSERT_CMP64(*((uint64_t *)(rsdp_table)), "RSD PTR ");
> }
> diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> index d661d9be62..84f1500920 100644
> --- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> +++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ typedef struct {
> const char *machine;
> const char *variant;
> uint32_t rsdp_addr;
> - AcpiRsdpDescriptor rsdp_table;
> + uint8_t rsdp_table[36 /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP size */];
> + uint32_t rsdt_physical_address;
I don't see rsdt_physical_address getting used anyway.
> AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 rsdt_table;
> uint32_t dsdt_addr;
> uint32_t facs_addr;
> @@ -83,21 +84,31 @@ static void test_acpi_rsdp_address(test_data *data)
> data->rsdp_addr = off;
> }
>
> -static void test_acpi_rsdp_table(test_data *data)
> +static void test_acpi_rsdp_table(test_data *data, uint8_t revision)
> {
> - AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table = &data->rsdp_table;
> + uint8_t *rsdp_table = data->rsdp_table;
> uint32_t addr = data->rsdp_addr;
>
> - acpi_parse_rsdp_table(addr, rsdp_table);
> + acpi_parse_rsdp_table(addr, rsdp_table, revision);
>
> - /* rsdp checksum is not for the whole table, but for the first 20 bytes
> */
> - g_assert(!acpi_calc_checksum((uint8_t *)rsdp_table, 20));
> + switch (revision) {
> + case 0: /* ACPI 1.0 RSDP */
> + /* With rev 1, checksum is only for the first 20 bytes */
> + g_assert(!acpi_calc_checksum(rsdp_table, 20));
> + break;
> + case 2: /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP */
> + /* With revision 2, we have 2 checksums */
> + g_assert(!acpi_calc_checksum(rsdp_table, 20));
> + g_assert(!acpi_calc_checksum(rsdp_table, 36));
> + default:
> + g_assert_not_reached();
> + }
> }
>
> static void test_acpi_rsdt_table(test_data *data)
> {
> AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 *rsdt_table = &data->rsdt_table;
> - uint32_t addr = le32_to_cpu(data->rsdp_table.rsdt_physical_address);
> + uint32_t addr = acpi_get_rsdt_address(data->rsdp_table);
> uint32_t *tables;
> int tables_nr;
> uint8_t checksum;
> @@ -626,7 +637,7 @@ static void test_acpi_one(const char *params, test_data
> *data)
>
> data->tables = g_array_new(false, true, sizeof(AcpiSdtTable));
> test_acpi_rsdp_address(data);
> - test_acpi_rsdp_table(data);
> + test_acpi_rsdp_table(data, 0); /* ACPI 1.0 RSDP */
> test_acpi_rsdt_table(data);
> fadt_fetch_facs_and_dsdt_ptrs(data);
> test_acpi_facs_table(data);
> diff --git a/tests/vmgenid-test.c b/tests/vmgenid-test.c
> index 0a6fb55f2e..5f30dee059 100644
> --- a/tests/vmgenid-test.c
> +++ b/tests/vmgenid-test.c
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static uint32_t acpi_find_vgia(void)
> {
> uint32_t rsdp_offset;
> uint32_t guid_offset = 0;
> - AcpiRsdpDescriptor rsdp_table;
> + uint8_t rsdp_table[36 /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP size */];
> uint32_t rsdt, rsdt_table_length;
> AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 rsdt_table;
> size_t tables_nr;
> @@ -52,9 +52,11 @@ static uint32_t acpi_find_vgia(void)
>
> g_assert_cmphex(rsdp_offset, <, RSDP_ADDR_INVALID);
>
> - acpi_parse_rsdp_table(rsdp_offset, &rsdp_table);
> + acpi_parse_rsdp_table(rsdp_offset, rsdp_table, 0);
> +
> + rsdt = acpi_get_rsdt_address(rsdp_table);
> + g_assert(rsdt);
>
> - rsdt = le32_to_cpu(rsdp_table.rsdt_physical_address);
> /* read the header */
> ACPI_READ_TABLE_HEADER(&rsdt_table, rsdt);
> ACPI_ASSERT_CMP(rsdt_table.signature, "RSDT");
> --
> 2.19.2
>
>
Thanks,
drew
- Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 6/8] hw: arm: Support both legacy and current RSDP build, (continued)
Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v2 6/8] hw: arm: Support both legacy and current RSDP build, Igor Mammedov, 2018/11/30
[Qemu-arm] [PATCH v2 7/8] hw: acpi: Export and share the ARM RSDP build, Samuel Ortiz, 2018/11/29
[Qemu-arm] [PATCH v2 8/8] hw: acpi: Remove AcpiRsdpDescriptor and fix tests, Samuel Ortiz, 2018/11/29
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/8] hw: acpi: RSDP fixes and refactoring, Igor Mammedov, 2018/11/30