[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Replacing (and removing) get_ticks_p
From: |
rutuja shah |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Replacing (and removing) get_ticks_per_sec() function with NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND Signed-off-by: Rutuja Shah <address@hidden> |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:27:41 +0530 |
Thanks Eric. I will keep these points in mind while sending patches.
Regards
Rutuja Shah
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 03/10/2016 12:30 PM, address@hidden wrote:
>> From: Rutuja Shah <address@hidden>
>>
>
> Your commit message body was botched, cramming everything into the
> subject line. Be sure you have a one-line summary (preferably shorter
> than 60 characters), then a blank line, before the rest of your
> description and S-o-b. Also, it's good to say "why" in the commit body,
> not just "what". Something like:
>
> maint: Drop unused get_ticks_per_sec()
>
> Replace the use of get_ticks_per_sec() with NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND,
> because...
>
> Signed-off-by: Rutuja Shah <address@hidden>
>
> --
> Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
> Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
>
Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] Replacing (and removing) get_ticks_per_sec() function with NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND Signed-off-by: Rutuja Shah <address@hidden>, rutuja shah, 2016/03/12
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] Replacing (and removing) get_ticks_per_sec() function with NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND Signed-off-by: Rutuja Shah <address@hidden>, Laurent Vivier, 2016/03/15