[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Replacing (and removing) get_ticks_p
|
From: |
Eric Blake |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Replacing (and removing) get_ticks_per_sec() function with NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND Signed-off-by: Rutuja Shah <address@hidden> |
|
Date: |
Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:10:51 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 |
On 03/10/2016 12:30 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> From: Rutuja Shah <address@hidden>
>
Your commit message body was botched, cramming everything into the
subject line. Be sure you have a one-line summary (preferably shorter
than 60 characters), then a blank line, before the rest of your
description and S-o-b. Also, it's good to say "why" in the commit body,
not just "what". Something like:
maint: Drop unused get_ticks_per_sec()
Replace the use of get_ticks_per_sec() with NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND,
because...
Signed-off-by: Rutuja Shah <address@hidden>
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] Replacing (and removing) get_ticks_per_sec() function with NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND Signed-off-by: Rutuja Shah <address@hidden>, rutuja shah, 2016/03/12
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] Replacing (and removing) get_ticks_per_sec() function with NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND Signed-off-by: Rutuja Shah <address@hidden>, Laurent Vivier, 2016/03/15