RE: [Pyatcron-devel-list] Requirements document on the CVS server

[Childers, Matthew]

> 
> > 3. check if there is any pending "at" command
> 
> Why do check for "pending" at commands only ? I think past at commands
> should also be displayed because the user may want to re-use an old
one
> later. Only users should be able to delete at tasks IMO.


I agree, I think we should check for all at commands.  We could also
maybe have a preference that you could toggle the display of old at
commands.  That way you could access them and re-schedule them if you
wanted, or you could hide them and remove the clutter.  What do you
think?