pspp-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Production Jobs


From: Charles Johnson
Subject: RE: Production Jobs
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 20:33:46 +0000

Please do not confuse the topics of discussion. Currently PSPP developers 
donate their time voluntarily. They decide on what functions/features can (and 
want to) work.

 No more we ask, they will perform.


Those interested in adding the "CTABLES" command, can contribute to the 
discussion on the mailing list for that issue, adding useful information to 
begin work collecting money, incentives, company that could do the job, etc.
 Moreover, if anyone is interested in SPSS production jobs, you can send sample 
files (SPJ and SPS files).

Thanks

CJT


________________________________
> Subject: Re: Production Jobs 
> To: address@hidden 
> From: address@hidden 
> Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 21:03:21 +0100 
>  
> Same with me. In survey analysis you have more ad-hoc analyses , so  
> less repetition. 
>  
> I am far more interested in using MR and CTABLES. 
> - ftr 
>  
>  
> On 08/11/2015 18:21, Matthias Faeth wrote: 
> I personally never use production jops and also never save .spv files  
> but export results to excel. But I might be untypical. 
>  
> Matthias Fäth 
> Im Mediapark 12 
> 50670 Köln 
> t: 0221-2907973 
> m: 0171-9832175 
> e: address@hidden<mailto:address@hidden> 
>  
> 2015-11-08 18:15 GMT+01:00 Ben Pfaff  
> <address@hidden<mailto:address@hidden>>: 
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 10:10:43AM +0100, John Darrington wrote: 
> > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 01:36:01AM +0000, Charles Johnson wrote: 
> > 
> >      From my point of view, production jobs are very useful to 
> >      automate lengthy and complex processes that are made 
> >      recurrently. As PSPP add more commands, the more useful they will 
> >      be in the future. 
> > 
> > 
> > How would they be more useful than any general method of automation? 
>  
> I would guess that SPSS users are used to them and that they may have 
> some that they consider valuable. 
>  
> _______________________________________________ 
> Pspp-users mailing list 
> address@hidden<mailto:address@hidden> 
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users 
>  
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________ 
> Pspp-users mailing list 
> address@hidden<mailto:address@hidden> 
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users 
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________ Pspp-users mailing list  
> address@hidden https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users 
                                          


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]