It's right. My bad.
--- Em qua, 1/10/08, Jason Creech <address@hidden> escreveu:
De: Jason Creech <address@hidden>
Assunto: Fw: [Pgubook-readers] Bug p16
Para: address@hidden
Data: Quarta-feira, 1 de Outubro de 2008, 13:16
I believe direct addressing is the correct mode in this example, meaning that you could load 4 as the address containing the data required by the instruction. If you
stored 4 in a register and used register addressing, then the value 4 would be the literal data used by the instruction, rather than a pointer to the required data.
--- On Wed, 10/1/08, Téssio Fechine <address@hidden> wrote:
From: Téssio Fechine <address@hidden>
Subject: [Pgubook-readers] Bug p16
To: address@hidden
Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2008, 12:28 PM
In the first paragraph:
"addressing mode and specified the %eax register, and the %eax register contained
the value 4,
whatever value was at memory location 4 would be used. In -->direct
addressing<--, we would just load the value 4, but in indirect addressing, we use 4 as
the address to use to find the data we want."
Would it be "register addressing" instead of "direct addressing"?
|
Novos endereços, o Yahoo! que você conhece. Crie um email novo com a sua cara @ymail.com ou @rocketmail.com. _______________________________________________
Pgubook-readers mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pgubook-readers
|
_______________________________________________
Pgubook-readers mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pgubook-readers
|