[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
## [Paparazzi-devel] Why krooz use int_euler stabilization

**From**: |
Eltonwu |

**Subject**: |
[Paparazzi-devel] Why krooz use int_euler stabilization |

**Date**: |
Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:52:25 -0700 (MST) |

I don't know the difference between the quat and euler
I fly with int_euler stabilization and quat stabilization.
I found a little difference. the euler seems to be more stableļ¼ quat
generates a little vibration. but quat seens to be more robust
All right, the above is all my guess and experiment result.
So the question is. WHY the krooz use euler instead of quat?
--
View this message in context:
http://lists.paparazziuav.org/Why-krooz-use-int-euler-stabilization-tp16646.html
Sent from the paparazzi-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

**[Paparazzi-devel] Why krooz use int_euler stabilization**,
*Eltonwu* **<=**