Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Why krooz use int_euler stabilization

[Eduardo lavratti]

only to confirm ... i  testes krooz with both and not see any difference.

---

Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:32:50 +0100
From: address@hidden
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Why krooz use int_euler stabilization

Hi,

which stabilization system you use is not tied to the board.

The euler implementation is easier to understand, but can't deal with the singularities that a Euler representation inherently has...

Why Sergey chose int_euler I don't know... how stable it flies IMHO mostly depends on tuning (the same parameters for both won't give you the same result).

Cheers, Felix

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:52 AM, Eltonwu <address@hidden> wrote:

I don't know the difference between the quat and euler

I fly with int_euler stabilization and quat stabilization.

I found a little difference. the euler seems to be more stable， quat
generates a little vibration. but quat seens to be more robust


All right, the above is all my guess and experiment result.

So the question is. WHY the krooz use euler instead of quat?



--
View this message in context: http://lists.paparazziuav.org/Why-krooz-use-int-euler-stabilization-tp16646.html
Sent from the paparazzi-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel

_______________________________________________ Paparazzi-devel mailing list address@hidden https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel