Re: [Paparazzi-devel] ublox max m8q

[Chris Gough]

We did quite a lot of side-by-side testing of different uBlox modules; 
generation 6, no SBAS coverage, fixed wing. Found NEO6Q and NEO6T equal best on 
ceramic patch antennas, no filter/amp and decent sized ground plane. 
Equivalent-spec modules in the MAX form-factor did not perform as well in 
testing (inferior timers?). LEA modules (flash-backed) ran slightly slower than 
the NEO equivalents (ROM-backed), i.e. 5Hz OK on NEO6x, but only 4hz on LEA6x.

Chris Gough

> On 9 Jun 2014, at 1:03 pm, Ben Laurie <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> On 5 June 2014 21:28, Felix Ruess <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I mostly use the Navilock NL-652 ETTL (ublox6) and also have some lea4 and 5
>> lying around.
>> Haven't tried any of the more recent ublox, so I can't tell if they are
>> better.
> 
> Newer ones should get more accuracy with appropriate configuration. I
> haven't managed to figure out how to get hold of one, though.
> 
>> 
>> Cheers, Felix
>> 
>> 
>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:39 AM, SilaS <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Is this gps currently supported in any way?
>>> 
>>> Which is currently the most practical gps for a copter?
>>> 
>>> I used previously only on plane lea4 and 5
>>> 
>>> SilaS
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel